User talk:Skalle-Per Hedenhös

You may have the wrong place

The English Wikipedia is not going to do anything about the Swedish Wikipedia, because we're not in charge of them.

WP:NOTSOAPBOX means the English Wikipedia is not a platform for you to propagate your views on cannabis on, nor a place for you to lament whatever injustices you perceive are going on over at the Swedish Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All we do here is cite, summarize, and paraphrase professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, without addition, nor commentary. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:38, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Did I ask english wikipedia to do something against swedish wikipedia? No I did not. I did discuss wikipedia. Did I propagate my views of cannabis? No I did not. I did say that facts about this plant should be accepted on wikipedia. It is an opinion about wikipedia.

Don't put words in my mouth. I did not say what you talk about. This technique is not OK.Skalle-Per Hedenhös (talk) 05:02, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You were complaining about the Swedish Wikipedia. This is the English Wikipedia. There is no point to complaining about the Swedish Wikipedia unless you think something can be done about it. Your complaints about how the Swedish Wikipedia handles cannabis articles make clear your views on cannabis.

If you were not making any sort of appeal, then your complaints were even less than useless.

Find something productive to do. Trying to "right great wrongs" is not productive.

Again: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All we do here is cite, summarize, and paraphrase professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, without addition, nor commentary.

If you continue to show less interest in that and more interest in whining, you will eventually be shown the door. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dream on that wikipedia is some neutral semi-professional fact-based encyclopedia. It is not and the english cannabis articles suffer the same structural problem as it is the prototype for the swedish articles (maybe with less fascist influences). I don't see the point you tell me my view of cannabis. I know my view that marijuana is a medicinal plant that must be provided to the people and that view I share with WHO nowadays. Don't pretend my view are inferior to yours and that english wikipedia is a different world than the swedish. Problems can be common. Do not insult people with another worldview.Skalle-Per Hedenhös (talk) 09:43, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've said nothing about my views on cannabis. I've just been telling you to stop whining and get to work, or else leave. Are you going to do this, or not? Ian.thomson (talk) 10:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to wait until I am unblocked and then continue to improve aka whine at swedish wikipedia. English wikipedia seem to be as full of hobbyfascists as the swedish one.Skalle-Per Hedenhös (talk) 10:29, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have the wrong place

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 10:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skalle-Per Hedenhös (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ian Thomson is clearly insinuating and seem to be paranoid. I see now that I have confused the coffee house with another place for discussing technical issues but this block is silly cause Ian Thomson insulted and provoked on my discussion page and could not take an answer. So a user that contributed with a descriptive picture that is featured on a page with 2 million users per year is clearly not contributing... Skalle-Per Hedenhös (talk) 11:06, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In reviewing your edits, I concur with the blocking administrator. Your description of Ian's edits could not be further from the truth. If you have issues with the Swedish Wikipedia, you need to take them up there(this block does not prevent your editing there, unless you are blocked there too). I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:13, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skalle-Per Hedenhös (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Clearly Ian Thomson was agressive, provoked and insulted on my discussion page and then could not take being called a hobbyfascist and immediately acted emotional and repressive as a hobbyfascists do. The reason for the block is silly. Ian Thomson claim to be mindreader cause he knows my intentions by intuition. You can not rationalize someone elses intention cause mind is irrational. Skalle-Per Hedenhös (talk) 11:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We're done here. You clearly have no place on the English Wikipedia. Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 13:23, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My premonition tells me that you are headed for a removal of your talk page privileges. (FTR, this user is blocked at sv.wiki with user talk page rights removed for general belligerence and PAs, so this is not just a feature of their poor English skills but a general behavioural issue. Looks like their block there will expire soonish, though.) --bonadea contributions talk 11:57, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this is another insinuation. My beef with them may also be because they are afraid of loosing the job and be treated as pariah (and blocked) if them don't support the governments vision of a drug-free society. Better go learn swedish before you speak about what that is about. Is all in the discussion page.Skalle-Per Hedenhös (talk) 12:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On the off-chance that any non-Swedish speakers are curious: the sv.wikipedia discussion is indeed informative, and shows clearly that the user in question doesn't have a great command of Swedish either; their characterisation of the debate there is exactly as true to reality as their characterisation of people involved in the discussion here. --bonadea contributions talk 21:45, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]