User talk:Sk8trgrl

This user is a student editor in Department_of_History,_University_of_California,_Los_Angeles/Global_Feminisms,_1850_to_Present_(Fall_2023_term) .

Welcome!

Hello, Sk8trgrl, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:11, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cathy Bernheim moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cathy Bernheim. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:39, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cathy Bernheim (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ca were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are some major referencing problems. For instance, vast swaths of text lack citation, which is vital for a biography of a living person.

This source, written by "olympedegouges" is being used to say that Cathy Bernheim is a member of Gouines Rouges, but does not even mention Bernheim in its text.

Same goes for [1], which does not mention Bernheim.

There are some tone issues as well. Words like "unwavering" and "pioneer" are not neutral terms. Sentences such as

She is considered to be a pioneer of the Mouvement de Libération des Femmes (Women’s Liberation Movement or MLF).

need to be attributed to someone (WP:Weasel words). This person is probably notable, since she is cited as a influential feminist(though the sources fail to go any more in-depth than that). I recommend finding some reliable biographies about Bernheim to support the claims made in the article. Good luck!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cathy Bernheim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 22:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sk8trgrl! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca ^{talk to me!} 22:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The list Wikipedia:Good_articles/Social_sciences_and_society#Culture,_sociology,_and_psychology, has some good articles about feminism and related people that you can use as an example for your draft. Ca ^{talk to me!} 23:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cathy Bernheim (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Cathy Bernheim instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please compare the draft and the article to see if the draft contains information that is not in the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cathy Bernheim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cathy Bernheim

Hello, Sk8trgrl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cathy Bernheim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]