User talk:Sk8rSoda

You've reached my user talk page. Please leave a message below

Speedy deletion nomination of John Dorus

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as John Dorus, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 15:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clarice Orteza

A tag has been placed on Clarice Orteza, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 16:00, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Clarice Orteza, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. causa sui (talk) 16:10, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Puffin. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed to be less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 15:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Half Barnstar
	DOUCHE JohnRunsCanada (talk) 15:48, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:JohnRunsCanada with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 15:20, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some falafel for you!

666 JohnRunsCanada (talk) 15:24, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:JohnRunsCanada with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 15:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	F &$% YOU JohnRunsCanada (talk) 16:23, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Potentially compromised account or puppet vandals. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:30, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because it is believed to have been compromised. Note that edits to your user talk page might not indicate that you have regained control of your account. If your rights to e-mail and edit your user talk page have been revoked, contact ArbCom at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org. Syrthiss (talk) 18:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Technically you are blocked as vandalism-only, but since you weren't a tosser earlier in your history I will agf and say you may have been compromised. Syrthiss (talk) 18:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

I have been hacked by User:JohnRunsCanada at school. He had gotten my password and started editing using my account. Right before, he had made an edit to Religion. --Sk8rSoda Cincinnati Bengals 23:01, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think WP:BROTHER might apply here. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:36, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know what this account did was wrong. My current IP is 70.20.116.233, and the school IP is 2xx.xxx.xxx.xxx (I don't know what the school IP is)

Also, another part of this is that User:JohnRunsCanada in school was ENCOURAGING me to vandalize the wiki pages. Well... I'm an autistic child, diagnosed with Asperger Syndrome. I tend to do things that I know are wrong... but end up doing them. --Sk8rSoda Cincinnati Bengals 23:55, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sk8rSoda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit that I hadn't followed the rules. I shouldn't be accused of sockpuppetry, however. As the location I am at is a school, I may forget to log out, and other students can use my account to do wrong edits. I would like to get unbanned, and I promise to not do this again. Sk8rSoda Cincinnati Bengals 11:54 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Sorry, but we absolutely cannot unblock you if you're unable to secure your account from being used by others. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:05, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another point is that now we know this account has been compromised, we have no idea who is making the unblock requests. It could be the original owner, or it could be the hacker - there's no way to tell -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:10, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just requested my password to be changed, via e-mail, and I changed my password. Sk8rSoda Cincinnati Bengals 20:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but we don't know who the *you* who requested the password change is - you could be either the original owner of the account, or the hacker, so getting the password changed now makes no difference! -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And the people who change your password should be able to unblock your account as well. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:31, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What information must I give to get myself unblocked? The only thing that I put on to identify myself is my e-mail address. --Sk8rSoda Cincinnati Bengals 11:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Think about it - this could be the hacker saying "What information must I give to get myself unblocked? The only thing that I put on to identify myself is my e-mail address", and he has had equal access to set the account's email address - so we have no way of knowing who's talking to us. There is no information now that you can give that the hacker can't, so I think you have to abandon this account. One thing that you could do for a future account is outlined at Template:User committed identity, which describes a scheme for securing your account in advance (by adding an encrypted message to your user page, but keeping the plain text message secret - a hacker can then not access the plain text version). You can see I have one at the bottom of my user page. But that needs to be set up in advance, and cannot be added after the hack has occurred (again, because we can't tell if it's you or the hacker doing it) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]