User talk:Sk8erPrince/Archive 1

Archive 1

Mirmo

Hi! I saw this edit regarding Mirmo. There was an English version of the manga released by Chuang Yi that uses dub names. That one doesn't show "mugloxes" - that comes from the ShoPro/VIZ licensing page. I don't know if the anime was ever dubbed in English though. WhisperToMe (talk) 14:43, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

I assumed that the English names were made up by fans along with the non-existent English cast before I removed them all. Thank you for clarifying that the Eng names were actually used in the Eng manga - that clears things up a lot. Sk8erPrince (talk) 14:50, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome! A Filipino editor I talked to on Discord said he watched the series in Tagalog and English, but he didn't remember who made the English dub (it could have been made in Singapore or in the US?) WhisperToMe (talk) 15:16, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Editing Qusetion

I have a question. I'm on bus Wifi. Could someone else have be on bus Wifi and made those unsourced edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.189.176.217 (talk) 12:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

No clue. Don't ask me. I don't have the answers you seek. Sk8erPrince (talk) 14:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Laws of the Universe poster.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Clarification of Wikipedia editing goals

Hi. Just wanted to drop you a note to say thanks for your handling of the issues on the Free! (TV series) page a while back. I have taken your advice to heart about editing. Also, I appreciated your simple explanation about why articles need to be terse. Simple language, not "policy battering" is usually the best approach in any negotiation. It's human, it's non-threatening and it promotes collaboration. That's what Wikipedia needs, imo, so thanks again. Ouranista 17:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ouranista (talk • contribs)

You're welcome. Sk8erPrince (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

File:HellsMovie.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

File:SSSS.GridmanAnime.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Mazinger Z

Hold your horses. Disruptive editing? Inappropriate? Blocking? You're making a mountain out of a molehill. You don't like the format? Suggest another, no problem. But in this article release dates are important because there's a wide difference between the world premiere and the premiere in the production country, so much it's another year! Learn a bit of patience and how to talk things out on the article's talk page instead of starting threatening people first thing. Flordeneu (talk) 15:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Says the one with a bad history of edit warring. It's obvious that you never previewed your revision, either. Tell me that I'm wrong when I said you went against the manual of style with your improperly formatted infobox. Sk8erPrince (talk) 16:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Mazinger-z-infinity.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Lack of civility

What the heck are you doing? Stop being a spoiled brat and start dealing with issues like a reasonable adult. Talk things and changes (that's what talk pages are for) instead of resorting to threatening users right and left with blocking when they do something you don't like and leaving insulting comments in the edit history. If you link to quote Wikipedia policy so much, then what about WP:CIV? Or do I need to remind you that you can be blocked for gross incivility? (which I see it wouldn't be the first time you'd been blocked). Grow up! Flordeneu (talk) 14:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.

Look, I am willing to talk it out civilly, but I would appreciate it if you could compare the revisions first before just reverting my infobox. I changed the infobox in the first place because there's an even more appropriate one for the article in question, so I utilized it. Sk8erPrince (talk) 14:50, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

The appropriateness of the template is debatable, but that's not the point. The point is your attitude, your complete over the top threatening messages in my talk page and your insulting comments in the page history. That's not the way of dealing with editing conflicts, or, in fact, with any conflict between reasonable adults. I'm not against debating differences of opinion, but I'm not going to put up with this kind of aggressive attitude. Flordeneu (talk) 15:00, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

I see where you're coming from; I was out of line on what I did. Sorry about that. I've removed the warnings on your talkpage, and in the future, I will refrain from posting warnings when it's more so a difference of opinion than an actual violation of policy. Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Apology accepted. Let's turn over a new leaf. Flordeneu (talk) 15:09, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Zombie Land Saga

Hello, I'd like to request that you don't immediately close discussions and delete counterarguments about the dispute on the Zombie Land Saga article. I provided valid counterarguments to your points, and simply deleting my message is not a productive way to discuss the matter. --77.161.126.44 (talk) 16:26, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

I never deleted any of your comments. And I'm closing the discussions because they are not productive, as new users are repeatedly spamming edit requests with no reliable sources to support their claim. There's nothing to argue about when Wikipedia demands verifiability on everything. Sk8erPrince (talk) 16:34, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Closing discussion before any time has passed, deleting counter-arguments shows you don't want there to be a discussion at all. Not to mention the frequent usage of the term 'transgenderism' which is a slur https://www.glaad.org/reference/transgender NickPenrhyn (talk) 17:12, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions in effect

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

TheDragonFire (talk) 12:49, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Request

I come in peace to let you know that I have retracted my comments of May 2018 (Free! Talk page) and struckout the antagonistic text to finalize the matter. With that in mind and in the spirit of good community relations, I am politely requesting that you strikeout your two comments about me per WP:IDENTIFYUNCIVL and revise your termination of discussion popup. I would like to continue working with you in the future and that would leave us with a clean slate. Thank you for your consideration. Ouranista talk 17:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

I have removed my replies. Sk8erPrince (talk) 17:42, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you.Ouranista (talk) 18:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Reverted edit of That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime

Why did you removed the pictures? Masumrezarock100 (talk) 22:53, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime

Who the heck you think you are? If you think those pictures are fake, you are totally insane. I gathered them from trusted and reliable sources. Have watched the anime yet? Those are totally same. Masumrezarock100 (talk) 22:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Read the MOS here. The pictures you are added are highly distracting to the character list; readers don't need visual aid for the characters. Hence, I've removed them as they are unnecessary and deemed them as not useful. And don't put words in my mouth - I didn't remove the pictures for that reason. They are most definitely real, but we don't need them to be integrated into the article. Sk8erPrince (talk) 23:01, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

There is some people haven't watched the anime yet. The images can be useful to represent the character designs. It could draw attentions of the viewers. And who gave you the rights to judge things if they are unnecessary or not? If you're distracted by it doesn't mean that others would. You should have discussed with the others before taking action. You may be an extended confirmed user but that doesn't mean that you can read viewer's minds. If you want you can report about me to the admin, I won't stop you. Masumrezarock100 (talk) 23:53, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime

Why don't you add rest of the characters description in the wiki? There is still not sufficient information in characters section. Masum Reza 14:37, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

And another thing why did you remove the anime cover pictures. Pictures of characters might be distracting but there is no rule for cover of a anime. Masum Reza 14:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

You just don't get it, do you? Here goes:

1) Don't abuse the Thank You button - one thank you is enough.

2) Don't tell me to perform tasks that you could do yourself.

3) What part of MOS:Images do you not get? I linked you the MOS last time; did you read it?

4) Please brush up your grammar - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; please don't clutter the article with less than ideal wording and grammatical errors - it's not constructive.

5) Learn how to properly sign your posts before you go complaining to me.

Honestly, I highly recommend that you read through the editing guidelines first before you make any more edits. Right now, I don't think you are being very constructive at all. Wikipedia isn't a fan wiki - character bios only need brief descriptions, not lengthy essays. Sk8erPrince (talk) 14:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

I didn't abuse it Masum Reza (talk) 15:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

What's wrong about the occupations of the characters? Masum Reza (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

For the last time, Wikipedia isn't a fandom wiki. You're better off editing on the Slime Isekai wikia, and not on the actual Wikipedia page. I've tried to explain to you why your edits are being trimmed and reverted by citing policy, but you really don't seem to get it. Please refrain from posting on my talk page from this point forward. I don't really like your attitude from your previous posts, so please leave my talk page. Unless you significantly improve the quality of your edits, that is. Sk8erPrince (talk) 18:26, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism

Why you did clean up the informations. You wrote that you would not hesitate to report vandals to the admins. Who is vandal now? You have know rights to clean up valid informations in wiki. I know you got a problem with me but there was other's edits as well. Those aren't long essays just short paragraphs. You are ruining the wikis. You are promoting vandalism. And I'll not disturb you on this day forward unless there is a good reason. Masum Reza (talk) 22:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

@Masumrezarock100: It's generally best to avoid calling an editor a vandal. If you have concerns about the edits, you are welcome to bring it up on the talk page of the appropriate project (in this case, WT:ANIME). Please remember to be civil and avoid calling people names. Just present the information and allow people to discuss it. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 01:06, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

About using the word "simuldub"

In response to reverting my edit on Conception (video game): The reason why I avoid using the word "simuldub" is because this word is trademarked by Funimation. Same thing with the word "dubcast", trademarked by HIDIVE. Per MOS:TM, this should be avoided because: "Don't expect readers to know, based on trademarks or brand names, what item is being discussed.", which is why I avoided using the word. Sure it's not favourable making it verbose, but I have no clue how to keep it concise and avoid using a trademarked term. "Simulcast" isn't a trademark, and in fact, the Wikipedia article for simulcast states that it's been used since 1948. So this claim that "simulcast" is as much of a trademark as "simuldub" would be inaccurate. Alex Tenshi (talk) 16:35, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Don't you think a reader could put 2 and 2 together based on the word? Simulcast = simultaneous broadcast; so using logic, simuldub = simultaneous dub with the country of origin, Japan
That being said, as long as this subsection is linked every time simuldub is mentioned, there shouldn't be an issue. Sk8erPrince (talk) 17:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

That works better, though that still doesn't technically resolve the "Don't expect readers to know, based on trademarks or brand names, what item is being discussed.", since "Simuldub" requires prior knowledge that it is an English-language dub, but it does make it a lot more clear with the linking to the relevant section, but I digress. But, to still comply with MOS:TM, it'll need to be capitalised and maybe with camelcase (ie: "Simuldub" or "SimulDub", not "simuldub"). Also, I don't think it should be referred to as a verb (ie: not "Funimation SimulDubbed the series", but instead "Funimation produced an English SimulDub")

Also, this doesn't solve Hidive's trademark of "Dubcast". There were a few articles that did use it, but they since have been modified, and I can't find any article using it. However, Hidive has no article, so a link can't be created there. Also, with the recent split of Crunchyroll and Funimation, how about Crunchyroll's simultaneous dubs, which I don't think have a name. This now leads to inconsistency between articles that are Funimation licensed and Sentai/Crunchyroll licensed.

Either way, I'm personally fine with your method (if capitalised and linked), though I don't know what others might think. Alex Tenshi (talk) 04:11, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

It's easy to determine who owns the master license based on who's in charge of home media distribution, and what cast is being used. Also, if Crunchyroll isn't exclusively streaming the series with a dub (see this example), then I think the usage of simuldub is acceptable as well. As for Dubcast, it's been mentioned here, as a subsection.
Either way, I think a discussion with other editors so that we could come to a broader consensus would probably be for the best. Sk8erPrince (talk) 08:03, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Well I brought it up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Alex Tenshi (talk) 09:52, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. I shall abide by the consensus in that discussion regardless of how it turns out. Sk8erPrince (talk) 10:12, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Rewrite

Can you rewrite the summary in List of Sword Art Online: Alicization episodes episode 12? I am no good in grammar you know. Even if you can't, I will not mind. It is just a request. Masum Reza (talk) 21:03, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

First of all, you've got a lot of nerve, asking me for a request. I thought you were under the impression that I'm "ruining" the project. Secondly, if English is not a language that you are not fluent in, then why are you even writing on the encyclopedia? You're just increasing our workload because we have to spend time fixing your errors, and that's not constructive at all. Also, why are you posting on my talk page again? I told you that you are not allowed to post here last time. Looks like I'm gonna have to ban you from posting here again. I'm sure you don't need help from a "vandal" like me, right? From this point forward, any and all messages you post here shall be promptly removed. I'm getting really tired of having to deal with you.
PS: STOP abusing that Thank You button. I don't need thanks from you. Sk8erPrince (talk) 21:14, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Greninja listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greninja. Since you had some involvement with the Greninja redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paintspot Infez (talk) 13:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Greninja listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greninja. Since you had some involvement with the Greninja redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paintspot Infez (talk) 13:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Input needed

Hey, Sk8erPrince, I'm currently cleaning up the Kirarin Revolution articles but currently need some input over merging and renaming some of the articles, such as Talk:Hana o Pūn / Futari wa NS#Requested move 4 January 2019, Talk:Happy (Koharu Kusumi song), and Talk:Chance! (Koharu Kusumi song). If it's okay with you and if you have time, would you mind looking over and telling me what you think? Thanks. Cheers. lullabying (talk) 04:46, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Oops, I didn't realize Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion was a thing for the latter two. But your input is still welcome! Thanks! lullabying (talk) 04:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Regarding various characters and "others"

Please note that if a voice actor did a bunch of named but not so important characters, I have grouped those into "various characters" and "others". They are technically not Additional Voices but grouped as such to indicate perhaps 30 or so named roles. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Honestly, those aren't significant enough for inclusion unless the VA tweets about those other roles in detail. Unnamed characters aren't much different than additional voices. Sk8erPrince (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Regarding FMA Movie voice cast

I don't mean to pry, but I'm not exactly sure how I can source Caitlin Glass having done the English dub for the FMA movie beyond "It's in the credits of the Netflix release," or this tweet acknowledging her presence in it. --Muppet321 (talk) 21:18, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Live action dubs are non-notable, so it'll get removed even if you sourced the info. Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Seven Deadly Sins Movie.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

• Sk8erPrince, please undo your last two changes at Kodomo no Jikan until you are able to get consensus for the changes you would like to make. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

I've reverted them. Sk8erPrince (talk) 20:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Glitter Force/Glitter Force Doki Doki

Why did you rename it back to usa names back to japanese names? Why are you doing this? I don't want to do an edit war with you. But you're making it back to the ordinary way. PascalMuganyizi (talk) 21:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Why? Because of the official English logos here. Glitter Force is an inappropriate article title; although it is an official English adaption, it does not represent the actual media in question accurately. And because of its inaccuracy, we cannot possibly place Glitter Force as the center of the article. Sk8erPrince (talk) 21:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

"Inappropriate"? But it was an official dub, and you say it's not an official dub? You must have pushed too far I don't want an edit war. PascalMuganyizi (talk) 21:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Having an official English dub does not mean it represents the media in question in a positive light, especially if you take in account of the name changes, censorship issues, and the amount of episodes deleted. Every *other* Pretty Cure series uses its original title; I firmly believe that an online encyclopedia should not spread confusion. And if you look carefully in the article, we *did* mention Glitter Force as the English adaption; we just no longer use GF as the center of the article. I don't get what you're worked up about at all. Sk8erPrince (talk) 21:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I find stuff that's true, and cite it to find the proof. I'm a honest man. PascalMuganyizi (talk) 22:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Andrew Love (actor)

Hello, Sk8erPrince. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andrew Love".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:04, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Lily's gender

The "consensus" does not reflect the reality of the matter. All of these sources are based on ambiguous quotes, 3rd party sources, and misunderstandings. Please refrain from simply writing something off as "truth" when the whole thing itself is ambiguous and unconfirmed. Thank you

Where's your proof that it's a misunderstanding? And where do you get off determining whether something is truth or fantasy? Wikipedia operates on consensus, and if your interpretation is not met with a broad consensus, then don't expect it to be approved, especially if you are removing references and sources. That's not the way to go about doing things on this site. Sk8erPrince (talk) 04:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Crunchyroll

I do agree with your statement that Riko is proper spelling and all, but I believe Crunchyroll isn’t an accurate source for Precure names. They don’t even do Precure subs, so shouldn’t you rely on something more trustworthy, like the anime itself? OmoriP (talk) 19:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Proper way to cite

Hi; I know we started off on the wrong foot, and I apologize for my actions. I’m not the smartest lady out there, but I am trying. My main point is; perhaps you could tell me what are and aren’t proper sources? Just so I know for the future. OmoriP (talk) 18:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

It's Mahou Tsukai PreCure, not Witchy PreCure. So Stop

I see you seem to have your heart set on making it look like Witchy PreCure is the official name and not Mahou Tsukai PreCure. I am terribly sorry to say that Mahou Tsukai is the official name and Witchy is simply just the English name. Yes, I am 100% aware that Wikipedia is an English site but that does not in any way mean that we should erase every trace of the original title by putting the English name. The title Mahou Tsukai came out before Witchy and therefore the wikipedia should have the title that came out first. It is ok to have the English title referenced on the page but it should in no way be referred to as the original name. That is essentially being disrespectful to the original work that people worked exceedingly hard on to create. I know that Witchy is the title that Toei USA uses but that does not mean we should treat it as the official international name.

You mentioned that changing the title from Witchy to Mahou Tsukai was simply us using our "fan logic" but is it really us who are using fan logic or is it you using that logic? You seem to like changing everything in a different language to what it's called in English because you are a fan of the English names and think they should be on top. We are respecting the original work and using the original name. So in reality, it's really you who is using fan logic and not the people trying to undo what you are doing.

Toei USA, the official English site, doesn't care about your feelings. What does a mere fan like you know about Wikipedia policy? Stop embarrassing yourself if you're not here to contribute positively. And look at you, trying to lecture me without even signing your posts? Yikes. Big yikes. Sk8erPrince (talk) 19:56, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Look at me trying to talk politely about respecting the original work and receiving a rude response back. I'm sorry if I'm new to Wikipedia accounts and don't know how to freaking sign a post. I'm trying to explain that if something is in one language first then it should stay in that language to respect the original work. Screw what the official English site says if it's the only official place that sites it as that. What does a mere person like you know about respecting something in it's original language when it's clear you think only the English version of literally anything in every single universe overrides everything else. LadyGravity129 (talk) 22:09, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

So in short, screw Wikipedia's guidelines? Yeah, okay. Get out of my talkpage, then. I'm done talking to you. You're officially banned from posting on my talkpage. All of your posts here will be swiftly reverted from  here on out. Sk8erPrince (talk) 04:42, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mega Man Star Force 2

Hi,

I'm glad somebody (you) is watching this page. There are too many pages without anybody watching.

I saw your recent reversion of my edits on it. Since Brotherband appeared as both one and two words, it seems that I had guessed incorrectly on the proper form. Although you probably will get an alert soon, I just wanted to let you know on your talk page that I made a further edit to change the remaining two word versions to one word for consistency. I also edited several sentences that addressed readers directly by changing "you" to "player" or "players", and reduced some ALLCAPS. I hope that these are all OK, but if not, please improve on these changes.

Regards,

Ira

Ira Leviton (talk) 01:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

List of Ultraman characters

Unfortunately they don't. The continuity is different if you watch the Ultraman series because the live action is later on connected to other successive series. The reason why I put the "manga" suffix during creation of that page is that one day I or someone else will create a page of character list for the original Ultraman series. If the readers click to this page's link, they will instantly believe its the original live action as well, whereas the live action has little relation to it. If you thought that the page also refers to the live action, then I dare to say that its going to be a huge mess. Live action and anime do not mix. Try that to the Garo and the their character pages.

For better understanding, allow me to demonstrate: Ultraman continues to Seven, then Return and Ace, and finally so on. Ultra Seven was the first series to actually have a diverged alternate continuity, called Heisei Ultra Seven that focused on the aforementioned Ultra Seven if it was a standalone Ultra Series to begin with. The Ultraman (manga) follows this example too. And also, in 2016, there is another novel called Ultraman F, which like the Ultraman (manga), focused on Ultraman 1966 being a separate continuity.

Zero stylinx (talk) 13:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

List of Sailor Moon characters.

The information on the page is factual, and I went through the references and removed the two that were fansites, but some of it (the "Creation and Conception" section, the "Character design" section, and Takeuchi's quotes in the "Merchandise" section) needs more sources, and the "Supporting characters" section needs trimming down/copy editing a bit. I agree that 81 references is enough for the article, that's why I didn't restore the More citations needed tag. (Just to let you know, I was the IP that added those tags in the first place). Thanks for being civil and not blindly reverting the rest of my edits. 2A00:23C5:2E01:FB01:50DD:7473:ABE1:890E (talk) 20:54, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Incivility

Hello Sk8erPrince. I saw your comment here and have significant concerns about the level of civility you exhibited. It is never acceptable to say that someone's editing or grammar "wreaks of a rancid ESL stench, if not worse"; it is never acceptable to tell an editor to "Learn to be more sensitive and self-aware for once in your life". The "rancid ESL stench" comment in particular borders on racism. I have removed the comment and ask that you refrain from breaching civility in the future. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 16:54, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

@L235: I think you got the wrong diff number. That's to an edit by Masumrezarock100, not Sk8erPrince. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:56, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

I've corrected the link. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 16:57, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

@L235: While I do not deny that some of my comments had crossed the line in regards to civility, that does not change the fact that the user in question has had a history of attacking me for simply performing standard tasks on the project. [1] [2]

Reza's insolence towards me has gotten so bad (especially the "vandal" and "ruining the Wiki" accusations as seen in Dif 2) that I had effectively banned him from posting on my talk page. Despite that, he continued posting on my talk page, asking for "favors" and "forgiveness", all of which I saw as disingenuous and insincere. [3][4][5]

Reza has also demonstrated repeatedly that he is incapable of leaving me alone. Even after I banned him from posting on my talk page, he *still* continued to abuse the Thank You button in an attempt to continue harassing me. [6]
I had warned him to steer clear from me in the next couple of months, but to no avail. [7] [8]

Furthermore, regarding Reza's grammar, while my criticism towards his lack of English proficiency was harsh, there is no denying that he is not fluent in the English language, and that is apparent in any anime article that he has edited frequently. You could also tell from the way he writes his messages. Whether Reza cares to admit it or not, it is a hassle having to clean up after him. At present, I *still* haven't rectified all of his grammatical errors across the anime articles that are on my watchlist. [9] [10]

While all the diffs above do not excuse my incivility, I just wanted to shed some light regarding this ongoing issue. It is obvious that Reza has no intention of leaving me alone, despite being warned countless times. I usually try my best to ignore him, but he keeps trying to provoke me just because he thinks he can. Sk8erPrince (talk) 18:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Unlimited Blade Works

I went a bit bold and moved the article Fate/stay night: Unlimted Blade Works to Fate/stay night: Unlimited Blade Works (television series) to differentiate it a bit from the movie article since the movie was created first and it appeared there was some sort of priority. By the way, I added a bit of information in regards to Tomonori Sudo who designed the cast. Do you think any templates should be removed? I would request a copyedit but I am at my limit with Saber's article and The King of Fighters. By the way, didn't the television broadcast censored one part where Gilgamesh kills Illya and was added to the home media? I tried searching for it but I found nothing. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:45, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

About - Sword Art Online

Is there any way to put that on the External Link rather than removing it? (That came from Crunchyroll News)

I've recently gave a note to fix my typos from the edit description in that Article Page Earvinexes21 (talk) 12:00, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

No, there is not, because the Instagram link is irrelveant. Sk8erPrince (talk) 12:34, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

New developments

There are new developments in the SPI I'm working on. What do you think? FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 17:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Harimua Thailand's disastrous edits

He did it again. He takes the character section from here and put it to here. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Ultraman_R%2FB_characters&type=revision&diff=903567781&oldid=903391293 As you can see, I told him once that both seasons are not entirely unrelated and then he ignore it again, even if Ultraman Taiga commercial says that the season took place in an alternate universe. Zero stylinx (talk) 17:02, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, I've noticed his trolling tendencies too. I might file a report to ARV if I manage to compile enough evidence. I hope he gets indeffed. Sk8erPrince (talk) 17:44, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

@Zero stylinx: I've also added a precautionary comment so that it doesn't happen again. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

@Sk8erPrince: Okay, this time he has to go for good. The Ultraman Taiga series is just a week away from the premier but he just adds the voice actor sections as if they're listed (which is not). They're yet to appear and nobody knows whether the recurring Ultramen were voiced by the original voice actors or just being silent. He did it without proof.Zero stylinx (talk) 12:23, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

@Zero stylinx: Can you compile an ANI report to get him indeffed? I'll assist in any way I can once you get it ready. Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, but I'm don't know how to do that.Zero stylinx (talk) 15:22, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Here's a list of instructions. You may also want to observe how other people file their reports on ANI. If you want him to get indeffed, you need to take action. Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:43, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

For safety precaution, I believe you should do it. I've seen many examples, but all the visible ones are the worst. Zero stylinx (talk) 02:28, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

@Sk8erPrince: Admit it, you don't know how to file a report, do you? Zero stylinx (talk) 05:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Excuse me? I most definitely *can* file a report, but this is your fight, Zero. Not mine. While Harimua's atrocities and lack of willigness to communicate are very concerning, I'm not in a hurry to file a report. It's not really my priority. I would appreciate it if you would refrain from making false accusations. Sk8erPrince (talk) 09:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Fine, I'll take it back Zero stylinx (talk) 18:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Banana Fish

Hi Sk8terPrince,

To the best of my knowledge, manga demographics are derived from the demographic for the manga magazine that a manga runs in. Even if we might think that the content might (and perhaps does) appeal to a different audience (but that is a completely different, albeit fascinating topic.) It's admittedly a pretty antiquated way of categorizing targeted demographics, but it's a staple of the manga field, for better or worse. So, Banana Fish, which ran in Betsucomi, a shojo manga magazine, would be classified as shojo, regardless of what we might categorize/classify it as today. Does that help to elucidate the situation? It's admittedly a little tricky.

Best wishes, Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 04:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

When you put it that way, it does make sense. Thanks. Sk8erPrince (talk) 04:53, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome! Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 14:15, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Bungo Stray Dogs

Despite my search, I couldn't find stuff about Atsushi's English actor. That or my listening is not good. Also, do you think the characters should be splitted or in its current shape, they are well suited for the main article? Cheers. Thanks for revising my edits.Tintor2 (talk) 15:16, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

You think you could make a brief copyedit for Atsushi and Dazai's articles? I would ask the guild of copyeditors but I already asked them for both Tekken 6 and Devil May Cry 5 so I can't request another one. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 18:24, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

My Hero One's Justice

The game My Hero One's Justice was NOT made by Dimps, it was Byking.

If you're right, then cite the source. Unsourced info *will* be challenged. Also, learn to sign your posts before you start posting on other people's talkpages. Sk8erPrince (talk) 00:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

The practice of red linking

@Sk8erPrince: Adding links to articles that do not exist yet is a fair procedure to bring attention to subjects that deserve their own articles, especially if the article an editor places the red link in (in this case, Nichijou) does not have an excessive amount of red links yet. LionFosset (talk) 06:55, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Kyoto Animation arson attack edits

Hello, I'm Baltakatei. I saw you attempt to make an edit to the KyoAni arson attack article. What you did broke a lot of stuff so I reverted it. I will try and figure out what edit you were trying to make (it looks like you were using the Visual Editor?). I would recommend you try to make your change in the source instead of what I think you did (copy-pasting text?) (click the "edit source" link on the "References" section and you should see all the reference data listed). Detailed explanation of the "edit source" feature is at: WP:T and H:WT. Sorry for having to revert (I will try and figure out what change you did and make it for you). I'm glad you chose to try and help at all. You're definitely following Wikipedia's principle of BE BOLD!. Keep trying! Baltakatei (talk) 18:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

I think I got your edit in. See here and here. I think you were attempting to add an AP News article with the suspect's name to the article?. Thanks for helping to clear up that {{failed verification}} tag! None of the references on that sentence actually named the suspect. It still misses a source that has his japanese name. this would make a good reference for his japanese name. Baltakatei (talk) 18:44, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hey there, thanks for the help. My apologies; normally, I'm more careful about editing by previewing my revision before publishing. I did not realize that I made a mess. I know how Edit Source works, don't worry. Part of the reason why that happened was because there was an edit conflict, and those tend to get pretty messy. I will be more cautious in the future. Thanks for including my ref! Sk8erPrince (talk) 03:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

a question

From the edit at How Heavy Are the Dumbbells You Lift?, did you meant in general don't write paragraphs like a plot summary? Because when I did, I was starting to go asleep and I usually don't write well? And its a bad habit of mine since interning at a new job position. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 00:28, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Yes, please stop writing plot summaries. Your grammar is subpar and I don't like having to clean up after your mess, especially when it could be easily prevented by learning how English grammar works. Or you know, you could also refrain from writing plot summaries in general, since you're adding onto our workload instead of actually helping.

I see that you haven't improved your grammar at all since October 2016, when you first joined. I don't think it has anything to do with whether or not you were sleepy; I cleaned up your mess at 5:23 AM, and you don't see me making embarrassing grammatical errors. I could also tell from the way you wrote your response that you're not fluent in English at all. So yeah, this has everything to do with your lack of English proficiency; stop making excuses when it is very evident that you're not actually contributing with those poorly written summaries. Sk8erPrince (talk) 02:39, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

I'll keep that in mind.

When I was younger, being about eight or nine, my relatives told me their Chinese or half South Korean and immigrated. Then after a few years, they wanted to move back and left their children behind. Leaving a bad experience for them growing up. Then about a year later, I had an incident and the doctor broke the news about me having a problem. So they almost wanted to say the condition and it was never defined by them. But for some reason they were able to tell that only happens if I'm under pressure, being yelled at, or it was indirectly. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 14:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Telling me your background story isn't going to change my mind about your how your edits are generally low in quality and they are not encyclopedia-suitable. If your dyslexia is prohibiting you from writing coherently, then don't you think you should get that fixed first? English proficiency is required in order to contribute to EN Wiki. Writing poorly phrased summaries is NOT constructive in the least; none of us should be spending extra time fixing them. I'd much rather revert your edits if they consist of grammatically challenged content. Sk8erPrince (talk) 17:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Cookery

Please stop making up genres. Cookery is not a genre that is recognized by reliable sources, and the ANN source you are citing to back it up doesn't even state ANY genres. —Farix (t | c) 10:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

As far as I am concerned, genres are defined by whatever category best describes the media in question. If you insist on removing it, then that's fine. I'm just really opposed to defining Food Wars as "adventure" since it's more action orientated, if anything. Sk8erPrince (talk) 11:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Maintenance tags

Hey, Sk8erPrince, please stop removing some of the maintenance tags when issues haven't been addressed. Articles like PriPara, List of PriPara characters, and List of Ojamajo Doremi characters are currently overly detailed and contain information that constitute as WP:FAN and WP:ORIGINAL. Template:Copy edit mostly pertains to grammatical errors only when these articles have other issues such as Template:Long plot. lullabying (talk) 17:20, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

That's ridiculous. Articles should be detailed, so that tag has no justifiable use. Sk8erPrince (talk) 17:24, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

There's a difference between providing detail and providing information that isn't relevant (i.e. why we don't include birthdays and blood types for fictional characters). Keep in mind that Wikipedia caters to a general audience looking for a summary instead of hardcore fans. lullabying (talk) 17:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Then you trim them instead of slamming pointless tags. If you think you could actually determine what's "relevant" info or not, good. You should be in charge of that, then. Sk8erPrince (talk) 18:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Well, the tags are to let other editors know what issues the articles have and to give them an idea of what needs to be improved. If you don't agree with that, that's okay but please don't remove them before discussing. lullabying (talk) 18:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Stephanie Sheh’s credit on Cannon Busters

I saw you last edit on Stephanie Sheh’s page and I’m sorry for adding the additional voices credit. But regarding the 1337 credit, how am I supposed to provide visual proof of something that only appears in the credits of the show? Max1057 (talk) 13:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Screencap the credits in the talkpage and then cite the episode in question. Here's an example of inline citation that you could utilize. You just need to modify the information to correspond with Cannon Busters.

Thank you for the help, I really appreciate it. Max1057 (talk) 04:04, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Anytime! Sk8erPrince (talk) 05:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Disruptive what

What disruptive editing? If you can't specify, don't even bother give a warning.

Looks like someone didn't read their warning on why their edits violate the WP:MOS. You've got a lot of nerve, for someone that doesn't even know how to sign their own posts. Go on, keep it up with your disruptive editing if you would like. Sk8erPrince (talk) 14:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Carole & Tuesday English cast is accurate

The English voice cast for Carole & Tuesday is 100% accurate. Here's a link: https://twitter.com/JRPictures/status/1167331269891387392.

I never said it wasn't accurate. If you've read my edit summary, my problem was that you failed to format the Eng cast properly. Judging from the fact that you didn't even sign your post, I'd say the revert is justified until you learn how to format and source roles properly. Sk8erPrince (talk) 09:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

Please stop your disruptive editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Convultional (talk • contribs) 20:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Says the one that can't even sign their own posts, nor do they know anything about reliable sources. Sk8erPrince (talk) 22:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

I'm an admin and I've been looking at the issue you reported to WP:AIV. I'm going to leave the report up on the board and not deal with it myself. However, I thought it best to leave you a note advising you not to revert any further. This is because I am not entirely convinced that the situation is anything other than a content dispute. First of all, the other editor is quoting a source (however flaky) which they claim backs up their argument; it's hard for me to ascertain without any domain knowledge whether they are being intentionally disruptive or if they have a case, but I should assume good faith (on both sides). Secondly, you have edited the post in question previously; arguably, therefore, you have an editorial stance and are not just "vandalism fighting" on a random article. Taken as a whole, WP:3RR may very well apply to both parties. --kingboyk (talk) 01:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your input. I will not violate 3RR and refrain from reverting any further, even if they continue. Sk8erPrince (talk) 01:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Archiving AN reports

Please also link the individual report/s in the edit summary (like so), so it's clear what's being archived. Thank you. El_C 00:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Understood! This was my first time archiving discussions; I will do a better job next time. Sk8erPrince (talk) 00:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Can you also slow 'em down a little? They should stay up for 24 hours, I believe; but, honestly, 2 or 3 hours is far too soon. Cheers, ——SerialNumber54129 08:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. Sk8erPrince (talk) 08:27, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Thirsty work, going that fast!  ;) many thanks for taking it into consideration. Cheers, ——SerialNumber54129 08:37, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

BTVA

Okay you're literally acting as an overall "extremist" with the way you commented especially when it comes to Behind the Voice actors. The ENTIRE point of the green checkmarks on the characters on the voice actors pages on BTVA is that they are verified by the official end credits or cited with a source by the actor themselves that's the point on BTVA. If it doesn't have the green checkmark then they aren't verified.

"Thanks for letting me know that you did not read my edit summaries at all, and you also did not edit those citations accordingly to indicate that the green checkmark is there. I'm glad to know that you are engaging in disruptive editing. WP:DISRUPT"

Frankly I say YOU are the one who's disruptive editing. WP:DISRUPT.--AnimeDisneylover95 (talk) 15:51, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

AnimeDisneylover95, if you want to use BTVA as a source, then you *must* indicate that green checkmarks are being used in the citation itself. I'm not gonna do it for you, since *you* are the one that is advocating for their inclusion. I'll stop reverting you for now, cuz I have reached 3RR. Do me a favor and read up our guidelines. I'll have you know, disruptive editing *could* lead to blocks, and you seem to have a not-so-good history with that..... Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:55, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Sk8erPrince says the person who constantly continues to act like an extremist and constantly ignoring BTVA's purpose of the green check marks here.--AnimeDisneylover95 (talk) 15:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

AnimeDisneylover95, at what point did I say you could not cite BTVA? I think you need to brush up your reading comprehension - I told you *multiple times* that you need to indicate that green checkmarks are present *in the citation itself* if you're using BTVA as a source. Like this: https://gyazo.com/10ca57baba9954b1e64c218e2a8fa7aa

Not to mention that you're just WP:REFBOMBING at this point, since you keep pasting the same source. On top of that, you're supposed to cite *the roles* within BTVA, not the VA page. That's refboming, and it's against our policies. Besides, what's the point of citing BTVA if the article has better sources for the same credits, anyway? Sk8erPrince (talk) 16:06, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

It doesn't matter, you still continue to act like a hypocritical "extremist" regardless if they are cited with a source (e.g. end credits for a show, convention bio, etc..). I think YOU need to brush up your reading comprehension cause the site said that the green checkmark. Here's the FAQ section on BTVA.--AnimeDisneylover95 (talk) 16:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

/sigh

I'll see you on WT:ANIME. I'm opening a case on you. If that doesn't work out, we might have to consider a topic ban for you on anime and voice actor related articles.... Sk8erPrince (talk) 16:15, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Re:

"Oh, sure. I can't read? I wonder how I could be effectively contributing to this community with nearly 9K contributions to my name, then. Really, that's such a lame attempt at an insult. I've *never* said you couldn't source BTVA, but it's clearly conditional. Now will you *stop* spreading utter lies about me? Stop being such a kid"

I'll grow out of it, but you will never stop acting so hypocritical and have a condescending to anyone with your attitude, regardless of your 9K contributions. So I say YOU need to stop acting as a kid.--AnimeDisneylover95 (talk) 19:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Don't use words that you obviously don't know the definition of. "Hypocrisy" is one word that is unbefitting of my modus operandi. And you're pretty lame, to be honest. Every single one of your retorts is nothing but "it's YOU that is [A], [B], [C]". Just.... get out of my talkpage. I'm banning you from posting here ever again. I've had it with you. Sk8erPrince (talk) 21:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Mikenorton (talk) 23:13, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Redlinks

To quote the guideline "red links help Wikipedia grow", which is why they are allowed and even encouraged. Three of them were fixable and the other (3 instances of "Cotabato Trench") is definitely notable ([1]) and one that I will attempt to get written quite soon. Mikenorton (talk) 14:47, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Mikenorton, that's not an assertion of notability. You're just showing me that sources exist, but I'm not seeing any traces of WP:VERIFIABILITY in them. If you can't piece together an article with those sources, then you have failed to assert its notability. Quoting WP:REDLINK, [Red links are used to show that]...an article should be created for the topic because the subject is notable and verifiable. Feel free to bluelink the subject when you have a well sourced article created. If not, I am going to go ahead and assume that it's not notable. Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:11, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

They you're not looking and to repeat a quote from the guideline "Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on the subject", as I said before the onus is on you. I've created a stub, which I will expand. Mikenorton (talk) 16:09, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Wrong. The WP:ONUS is on *you*, the person that claims that the red linked subject is notable. WP:PROVEIT. I'm not the one that wants to write an article for Cotabato Trench. That's on you. And you're supposed to make an article worthy draft with lots of reliable sources before publishing. You shouldn't be publishing stubs and then go, "Yeah, I'll just expand it later". Sk8erPrince (talk) 16:16, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Your view on redlinks seems to be that they should never exist, because you have no patience with them, despite the guideline, even if an editor follows it word-for-word. Why not try to get the guideline rewritten if it offends you so. Alternatively you could just go back to editing in your normal areas and leave others to follow the project's guidelines in theirs. Mikenorton (talk) 18:47, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

You believe that the redlinked subject is notable, but I don't. Am I supposed to just take what you have to say at face value, or is there any evidence that proves that? We don't need non-existent articles. What we need is well sourced full length articles. Sk8erPrince (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Formal warning

Sk8erPrince, based on your statements here and on your user page, it's clear that your views and actions are not in line with policy. Above, your statement actually seems to very strongly suggest that you don't know the difference between notability and verifiability. In fact, it makes no sense that you say "I'm not seeing any traces of WP:VERIFIABILITY". Sources are not "verifiable", content has to be verifiable with reliable sources. You can't just reject sources because they're "not verifiable". It's literally a completely nonsensical argument. In addition, you've linked WP:ONUS and WP:PROVEIT, which both link to the verifiability page as well, when attempting to discuss notability. This is a serious issue for a user who should know the difference by now. WP:REDLINK is simple and meant to be treated with common sense—we encourage redlinks that point to potential articles, but not redlinks that are not potential articles. This means that you have to have a valid, policy-based reason to remove redlinks, same as removing any other content. If you don't have one, that's disruptive editing. You can't just say "I don't like redlinks and I remove them when I see them". You have to put forth a legitimate explanation as to why the red link can not ever reasonably be a potential article. If notability is even debatable, you can't force the issue, because individual users cannot declare something "not notable", that's something the community has to decide on. You're not supposed to like red links. But that doesn't mean you remove them. That means you're supposed to help create the article. It's exceedingly clear you're not appropriately removing redlinks, so I encourage you to stop altogether, with a warning that the next time this happens, you will be blocked. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 01:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Swarm, I understand. I acknowledge the warning. I would politely ask for sources/evidence that indicate notability if any reverter believes that their red links are justified. I will not edit war over red links. The advice given by admin Izno here seems to be pretty sound. If it's about notability, what you should be requesting is the sources indicating notability, not making a non sequitur about a draft. People can work on drafts which are not notable, and work on sources without having a draft which indicate notability. Sk8erPrince (talk) 06:52, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

If you want to dispute the notability of an article, WP:AFD is the correct venue. However, the same principle applies. You’re expected to nominate articles at AFD after doing your own research and confirming that the article isn’t notable. You can’t just blindly nominate articles and say “I demand proof that this is notable”. Just like you can’t blindly delete redlinks because you’re making an assumption and demanding that other people disprove it. That’s disruptive either way, and likely to be met with a swift block as well. Simple concepts, right? These are elementary editing practices. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 08:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I understand what you are saying, and I will keep that in mind. Sk8erPrince (talk) 08:16, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Maintenance tags

Hi, please stop removing maintenance tags from PriPara and List of PriPara characters when issues haven't been completely addressed on the basis that "the poster isn't willing to address the issues themselves." The maintenance tags are to let other editors be aware of what to fix. lullabying (talk) 18:53, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder to assume good faith and not attack editors

Hello, I'm Lullabying. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lullabying (talk) 22:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Didn't know you could remove my edit summaries when you're not even an admin. Plus, what you're saying really *is* nonsense (and don't you deny it), since there are multiple reliable sources that proves Vic Mignogna's age. I don't know why you're so hellbent in denying them when there isn't even any active "discussion" going on regarding his age. But if you have such a big problem with it, then how about I do you a favor and take out his age altogether so you can't complain about it anymore? Geez. Give me a break. Sk8erPrince (talk) 22:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

My bad -- I put in the wrong template. But noticing your responses to me and other editors have me concerned about your lack of good faith in other editors as you have been adding condescending/belittling comments in your edit summaries and talk pages. I honestly do respect the effort you put into improving articles, but you need to stop going to extremes and attacking other editors who disagree with you. Just talk it out calmly. lullabying (talk) 22:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

I do admit that I got a bit heated there, but still, I want you to understand my perspective - it's irritating that we aren't being precise with Vic's age. It shouldn't be "1962 or 1963"; that's just a rough estimate, and it doesn't look good. This is why I'd much rather remove the subject's age altogether since it's not precise. Sk8erPrince (talk) 23:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

The birthdate situation is better discussed on his page and AngusWOOF (talk · contribs) answered it better than I could, but I'm mentioning your behavior in general when it comes to dealing with conflicts. I'm happy to cooperate with you, but you need to stop antagonizing and intimidating editors with edits that you disagree with. lullabying (talk) 23:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

I'll try not to. I know you're not a troll, and you're definitely here to contribute, just like me. I'll keep that in mind. Sk8erPrince (talk) 23:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Precure generations

What is this stuff about Precure generations? Doesn't give the articles any added value imo Rctgamer3 (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Rctgamer3, the generations are absolutely relevant; the JA articles all list the Cures' generations and this element is also noted in the Precure crossover movies. To elaborate - the newest generation of Cures at the time of release are always treated as the rookies by the older generation Cures. The first generation Cures, Honoka and Nagisa, are seen as the senpai by all the other Cures, *especially* in All Stars Memories.

Think about it like this - it's just like how the Pokemon games are categorized by generation. Sk8erPrince (talk) 17:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Hm, fair enough. Rctgamer3 (talk) 18:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

AnimeDisneylover95

You have said enough there. Please back off. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:48, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Understood. I shall not comment any further. Sk8erPrince (talk) 21:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. I appreciate it. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:50, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Lightburst (talk) 03:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Requests for page protection...

...be so kind and read our protection policy if you have not done so already. Keep in mind that protection essentially shuts out a large number of people who might want to edit the article, not only the ones disrupting it. If just one IP disrupts an article, using AIV is simply the more effective and elegant way to protect the Wikipedia. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 13:30, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Lectonar, I have read the protection policy. The reason why I requested the Natsuiro Kiseki article to be protected is because it has been protected before for the same reasons - trolling IPs would swoop in and vandalize the article with an imaginary English cast. I'm convinced that more than one troll is targeting the article; if so, reprotection would be necessary. Sk8erPrince (talk) 13:59, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

They swoop in with weeks going by between the swoopings, the page has been protected (once!) for 3 days in August. The case rests. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 14:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

That's fine. Within one week, my prediction turned out to be true. Sk8erPrince (talk) 18:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Biographies of living persons

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Lord Roem ~ (talk) 00:42, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

You may not be back for a while, but I wish to explain that the previous edit on List of The Seven Deadly Sins characters was not a disruptive edit but a misunderstanding which I hoped to have resolved. Storywise, since the page is in need of updating, there was a Second Holy War that occurred in the manga (and presumely in the anime's third seasont) had and the Demon King, revealed to have using the Ten Commandments to select a host body, is currently possessing his son Zeldris with his other son Meliodas currently his equal due to possessing him at the climax of the Holy War arc. 2603:9000:7D0A:8C00:BCF7:9CA9:86CC:CB67 (talk) 01:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

About the "Redlinks" talk section

I get it now, why you didn't reply to the "The practice of red linking" talk section I posted. As can be seen in the "Redlinks" section, you were a hardliner against redlinks, even if the Wikipedia guideline stated otherwise. LionFosset (talk) 04:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)