User talk:Sjwarnold

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Beloved Freak 20:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Sam Arnold

A tag has been placed on Sam Arnold requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:10, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Please don't redirect your user talk page to the talk page of any article. The user talk page is for other editors to communicate with you. See Wikipedia:USER#Categories, templates, and redirects. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:18, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Angr, you may be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Metropolitan90, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 14:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

NawlinWiki (talk) 14:29, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]