User talk:Sjw.2019
Sjw.2019, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Sjw.2019! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC) |
February 2019
[edit]Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 91st Academy Awards have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 16:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at National Board of Review Award for Best Actress, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 14:36, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Trying to cover Brie Larson hate speech
[edit]Was editing Brie Larsons article with all the needed references about her hate speech against all white man, but was rejected by reason "It's already been covered, how much more do you want? discuss on talk page", while in wiki page is only this line "Her complaint about being interviewed by a majority of white men led to an attempt at review bombing Captain Marvel's page on Rotten Tomatoes with sexist comments." It has no references + it turn things around, that others are review bombing marvel with sexism content, making her less responsible for everything. in my opinion in Wikipedia you should write all data with all needed references. And if correction is changed cause references and more explanation is added, then it is just wrong and looks like personal interests are involved!!! Either way that sentence should be corrected and explain more why something like that happened in rotten tomatoes!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andzejsw (talk • contribs) 08:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)