User talk:Sjd american author

May 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to McDonald's— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:33, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Taco Bell, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:36, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Global warming, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SUBWAY 18:35, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Global warming, you may be blocked from editing. Robynthehode (talk) 18:35, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 18:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sjd american author (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Two people told me that this was my last warning, then someone blocked even though I didn't do anything else. Sjd american author (talk) 18:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sure why you think that was relevant. Are you trying to claim all of your edits before the warning were appropriate? They clearly weren't. Are you claiming you needed the warning to realise your edits were inappropriate? If so, that's an argument you can make but it just means we'll change the block to WP:CIR. Are you claiming you should be free to harm Wikipedia until you get warned, even though you know you were harming Wikipedia? Surely not. Yamla (talk) 18:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.