User talk:Sjano

Notability of Comodo AntiVirus

A tag has been placed on Comodo AntiVirus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. VivioFa teFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 09:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the page Comodo AntiVirus, because it seems to be a promotional (possibly copied from the software web page). Wikipedia is not an advertising board. If you believe that Wikipedia should have an article about this software, the article should be re-created from the scratch (but please see the relevant notability guidelines for companies/products, and the proposed guidelines for software first). Regards, Mike Rosoft 10:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imaginary friend

I think there has been a misunderstanding: when contributing to Imaginary friend, I did not revert any of your edits, but did revert to an older version which only differed from the then current revision by having a "See also" section and having different wording describing imaginary friends in adulthood, but having nothing to do with religion. If you were contributing with IP 84.211.46.16, then your edit was reverted by IP 65.201.130.146 instead (see this diff). Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 21:17, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]