User talk:SixteenBitJorge

Welcome!

Hello, SixteenBitJorge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! TJ Spyke 21:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comment

As an editor of the article "Jhonen Vasquez", you are invited to a Request for Comment (as suggested by Admin Luna Santin). Please see: Talk:Jhonen Vasquez#Request for Comment: Book format. -- Tenebrae 04:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minor barnstar

		The Minor Barnstar
		For cleaning up the cruft from the Guilty Gear (series) articles, this is for you ^_^ Danny Lilithborne 11:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Metroid Secret Worlds

You said the secret worlds have no place in the Metroid wiki? It is one of the most famous aspects of the game! I feel it certainly has a place in the article. I wrote the section become it was mentioned in the discussion page. It is perfectly relevant to the game, and it should be included. Surely these wiki articles should only be cleaned up if they include irrelevant content. I don't think this information on the secret worlds that I took the time to write can be described as irrelevant, especially if it was requested.

Kinch82 16:31, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know you meant well, but that section was too much like something one might read on GameFAQs, and Wikipedia is not a game guide or turtorial (see point four on that page). Pages should cover only basic gameplay, not specific facets (You don't see a section on speedrunning, do you? That's also a huge feature of the game)Furthermore, the prose was not at all encyclopedic. The question marks, exclamation points, and overly casually demeanor should not exist on any article here. Read the Manual of Style to see how articles should be written. If you disagree with my removal, bring it up on the talk page. SixteenBitJorge 00:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I can agree with what you are saying. However, can we agree to keep the secret worlds section (I will re-write it to cover just the facts about the existence of the secret world) and remove the door-jump technique section? This just keeps the section factual and removes the GameFAQs style explanation you speak of. Funnily enough, I was thinking of adding a small section about speedrunning. You say pages should only contain basic information? I think I would lose interest in Wikipedia if all pages just kept to the basic hard facts. If I add information about the secret worlds of Metroid, written in an encyclopedic manor, would you be happy to have it remain there?

Kinch82 16:31, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on how it turns out. If you're really dedicated to this subject matter, I'd suggest it be put on its own page, that is, if this gameplay facet spans multiple games (I know there's something like that in Metroid Prime). That's what's done for speedrunning, and I'd have no problem with it. I feel like a section for that on the Metroid page itself would feel a bit out-of-place, but a "see also" link to "Metroid series secret worlds" could be fine. I don't know how it will fly with other users, though. You just make the page, I'll help you copy edit it, and we'll see how it turns out. SixteenBitJorge 18:16, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Man Group event

Adding the opening of the new Blue Man Group venue in Orlando to the June 7th events page does NOT constitute vandalism. Think before you revert.

I don't know what you're talking about. SixteenBitJorge 01:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]