Jump to content

User talk:Sissicxi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Sissicxi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 12:30, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Services Transactions on Cloud Computing

[edit]

Hi, I'm Elliot321. Sissicxi, thanks for creating Services Transactions on Cloud Computing!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please try to add more references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Elliot321 (talk) 13:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Services Transactions on Services Computing

[edit]

Hi, I'm Elliot321. Sissicxi, thanks for creating Services Transactions on Services Computing!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. please add more references for this page

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Elliot321 (talk) 13:09, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Services Transactions on Internet of Things

[edit]

Hi, I'm Elliot321. Sissicxi, thanks for creating Services Transactions on Internet of Things!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. please add more references for this article, too

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Elliot321 (talk) 13:11, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your suggestion. I created Services Transactions on Internet of Things and other entries because when doing research, I found that they are all related to a growing discipline — Services Computing. I decided to create a series of entries to let people have a clearer understanding.

I still have some questions. After I modify the article and add more references, can I resubmit the entry? I can't find any instruction. Sissicxi (talk) 02:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Sissicxi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. A Wikipedia article needs to be written from a neutral point of view, and Wikipedia policy does not permit promotional writing. Thus, for example, there is no room for articles telling us that journals are "prestigious", that they are "a valuable resource offering latest technologies", that they "provide the core resource" ao that readers "can explore and maximize the latest technologies"; nor does including such expressions as "aims to be", "contrives to", and "is designed to" in any way detract from the fact that those pieces of marketing-seak are what your writing was intended to convey to the reader as the overall impression.

Because of the promotional nature of the articles you have created, they have been deleted, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. However, I think it only fair to warn you that even if the articles had been written in a totally neutral way, I think it is very unlikely that they would have survived for long without being deleted. That is because the subjects of the articles do not appear to satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I have searched for evidence that they do satisfy those guidelines, and found none. An article on a subject that does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability standards is likely to be deleted, no matter how the article may be written. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:42, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your comment. I created Services Transactions on Internet of Things and other entries because when doing research, I found that they are all related to a growing discipline — Services Computing. I decided to create a series of entries to let people have a clearer understanding. So I don't mean to have a conflict of interest (COI). I will correct all the misleading words.

I still have some questions. How can I make my articles satisfy the notability guidelines? Some say that the importance of articles should be showed in summary or reference (I don't remember the exact words), but I can't find the right place. After I modify the articles and add more references, can I resubmit the entry? I can't find any instruction.

Waiting for your answerSissicxi (talk) 02:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is about the subject, not about your writing. If there are no independent, reliable sources which mention the journals you're trying to plug then it's unlikely you'll ever manage to show that they are notable.
Adding a list of topics that the journals may, or may not, cover - without any supporting references - merely makes your article look like an advert rather than the encyclopedia article it ought to be. I removed it once and you've replaced it and included the same in your new draft. Having told you why it doesn't belong, I'll leave you to do as you wish. Cabayi (talk) 09:12, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I omitted the part when submitting the draft. Thanks for removing it.Sissicxi (talk) 09:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Services Transactions on Big Data

[edit]

I've moved Services Transactions on Big Data to Draft:Services Transactions on Big Data which is where I believe you meant to create it having noted the draft tags and read your discussion on JamesBWatson's talk page. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 09:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC) Yes, I followed the instruction but still made mistake. Thanks a lot Cabayi! Sissicxi (talk) 09:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Conference on Cloud Computing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Conference on Cloud Computing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Icewhiz: Hi, Icewhiz. I saw your message at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Conference on Cloud Computing. I do think some points should be clarified. First, the three conferences, also with some other conferences, form a federation. But from the very beginning, the conferences were held separately, so I chose to create the articles one by one instead of creating a page of federation. Second, they are organized by the Services Society. This is the fact and can't be denied. I wrote these articles in a plain way and didn't have a conflict of interest. Third, these conferences are all published by IEEE and are recorded by the conference rank, so it's not surprising that some references are similar.

I'll leave my comments at the discussion page. Sissicxi (talk) 01:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Conference on Services Computing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Conference on Cloud Computing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of International Congress on Big Data for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Congress on Big Data is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Conference on Cloud Computing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Services Transactions on Big Data, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sissicxi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Services Transactions on Services Computing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Randykitty (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]