User talk:Sisko-guntury

April 2022

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. -- Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 16:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Guntury (April 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Numberguy6 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Zero non-primary sources cited. Phrases like "history from more than a million years" suggest WP:VANDALISM.

Numberguy6 (talk) 18:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guntury (April 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Numberguy6 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Zero non-primary sources cited. Phrases like "history from more than a million years" suggest WP:VANDALISM.

Numberguy6 (talk) 18:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guntury (April 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This submission is a bad joke. See Wikipedia is not for jokes. Do not submit bad jokes for review; it is considered disruptive and may even result in a block.

This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references.

Do not resubmit this draft without references. You can ask for advice about references at the Teahouse.

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that the appropriate notability criterion is satisfied. In particular, this draft does not appear to indicate that WP:GNG is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:GNG for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sisko-guntury! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Sisko-guntury, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]