User talk:Sisip
Welcome!
[edit]
|
September 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Milkana G. Palavurova has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://premadeviyoga.wordpress.com/mengenal-lotus-yoga/.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:11, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Milkana G. Palavurova do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.premadeviyoga.wordpress.com/mengenal-lotus-yoga/.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
The page you have created
[edit]Hi, I just saw the page you made, Milkana G. Palavurova. I just removed all of the references, because they do not meet the guidelines in WP:RS. Several of them were self-published, and so don't qualify in that respect. None of them actually mentioned her, except for her homepage. You mention in the text that she published on those sites; that, however, doesn't count as a reliable source, because it isn't independent of her. I recommend that you check the guidelines in WP:RS, which explain what counts as a reliable source. In short, what you need are sources that are independent of Palavurova, that are reliable (things like magazines, newspapers, professional journals, etc.), that talk about her (or possibly her works) in detail.
Unfortunately, we have another policy, called WP:BLP--this is Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people. One rule of that policy is that all such articles must, without exception, have at least one reliable sources (as defined in the WP:RS policy), or the article must be deleted. As such, I have to add what is called a BLP-PROD to the article. That will mark the article as a BLP without any references. You (or anyone else) will have 7 days to add such at least one reference. If you do not, the article will be deleted. If you do, you can then remove the tag, although I recommend asking someone (like myself) first, just to be sure that the reference you added counts as reliable. Please note that doing this does not guarantee the article won't be deleted, as there are other policies (the most important being that eventually you need to prove that this person meets our [[WP:BIO|notability guidelines for people). Please, at any time, feel free to ask me a question on the article's talk page or on my talk page--I'm happy to help. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:11, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
The article Milkana G. Palavurova has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:11, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Your comment on the talk page for above article
[edit]Could you please explain on the article's talk page why this page "deserves" to be on Wikipedia? Please keep in mind that we have specific criteria for who can and cannot be the subject of articles. In this case, as a living person without a specific category (like Athlete, Professor, etc.), she falls under the provisions of WP:BIO. Can you please explain how she meets those criteria? Thanks. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Maintenance Tags
[edit]I've been reverting you on removing the maintenance tags from the yoga teacher's article, and I've been leaving you edit summaries explaining why, but it occurred to me that you may not know how to look at edit summaries, or may not understand my explanation.
First, to see a history of the edits made to an article, on the upper right of your screen, if you look 3 tabs to the left of the search box, you'll see the words "View History". If you click on that, you can see a list of the edits made. Generally, most users leave an "Edit Summary" with their edits, which is an explanation of what was changed and why. Sometimes we use special abbreviations and shortcuts, but don't worry about that for now.
On the article you've been editing, you'll see that I've been leaving you an edit summary which says that you aren't allowed to remove maintenance tags (that's the big box at the top of the article that you keep taking out) unless you actually fix the problems associated with those tags. Since you haven't done so (you haven't shown why the person is notable, there's no wikilinks in the article, etc.), you have to leave the tag there. The purpose of the tag is to alert all readers and editors that this article needs some improvement. It is designed to spur an increase in the article's quality. So until those problems are fixed, please leave the tags there.
I do hope you're reading your page here, and I would love it if you replied here, on the article's talk page, or on my talk page with questions or at least an acknowledgement that you've understood this.
As a final note, I have to give you a warning. I know you're making the deletions in good faith, but we do have a rule on Wikipedia called the WP:3RR rule. That rule says that you may not undo the work of another editor more than 3 times in a 24 hour period. You have now undone the maintenance tags three times; technically, if you do it again, you can be blocked from editing for a short period of time. I would really prefer this doesn't happen, but it is a pretty firm policy. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC)