User talk:Sirmoor536825

Welcome!

Hello, Sirmoor536825, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as James Francis Gallatin, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cubbie15fan (talk) 21:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James Francis Gallatin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on James Francis Gallatin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cubbie15fan (talk) 21:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Francis Gallatin

The article James Francis Gallatin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cubbie15fan (talk) 00:45, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Francis Gallatin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Francis Gallatin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Francis Gallatin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cubbie15fan (talk) 01:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:28, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Recent Comments

That you believe that you're able to surmise an individual's expertise, interests, and level of intelligence based upon editing history fails Wikipedia:GOODFAITH. In my judgement, your comments were passive aggressive. I encourage you to read through this information provided through these two links.

I edit Wikipedia for fun, and I enjoy sports. Maybe I also enjoy and am knowledgeable about world history and consider myself a straight ally. I would not assume that you have no working knowledge on sports because as you detailed you have interests in "more secure in understanding the War of 1812, antisemtism in Europe in the 19th & 20th Century and the importance of cultural artefacts, and the religious significance of stained glass windows". One does not equal the other.

Keep in mind Wikipedia is just a website. You do not know me, nor do I know you. Cubbie15fan (talk) 02:35, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Recent Comments

It was not meant to offend, however my point was on your decision that James Francis Gallatin was not a notable person after you had seen the links I sent from academic, and National Newspapers in 2015, 100 years after his death. It passes all the WP:Bio tests and you placed it for deletion after I had provided corroborative evidence and links to you on Talk. I asked you to retract the speedy deletion and what you did next was push it for deletion on the grounds of WP:Bio. Now I am a newbie and I guess you will have also read the rules about how you are meant to treat them. What you did when I provided the evidence was push to delete which I would suggest is Wikipedia:Passive Aggressive having just read my rebuttal of your WP:Bio. I was acting in good faith assuming that when the evidence was presented that you would withdraw, when the facts were presented, that clearly turned out not to be the case. I do not accept that my comments failed Wikipedia:Assume good faith because you posted your WP:Bio delete after I had provided the evidence and if it were not for another person on here I would not have know how to respond appropriately, being a Newbie. I would suggest to you that the reverse may be true as you acted, knowing that I had provided evidence that your WP:Bio was without merit and yet you still posted it.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin Sandys (Parliamentarian) has been accepted

Edwin Sandys (Parliamentarian), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 01:30, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've accepted the article, but please remove all citations to wikis and replace with better sources. Wikis are never reliable sources per WP:UGS. Rusalkii (talk) 01:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]