Jump to content

User talk:SirGallantThe4th

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lebot confused

[edit]

On my Talk Page it just notified me Alexander S. Wolcott failed GAN. However, it looks like you promoted the article to Good Article. mmmmmmmm--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:33, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Here's something to motivate you and to let you know that your contributions are appreciated. Keep it going! Volten001 04:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My first barnstar :) Thank you kindly! SirGallantThe4th (talk) 19:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Discussion

[edit]

It appears that an article that you approved for GA status, 15.ai, is being nominated for deletion. Would you consider chiming in the discussion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HackerKnownAs (talkcontribs) 19:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I’ll take a look. SirGallantThe4th (talk) 20:46, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for 15.ai

[edit]

15.ai has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Brocade River Poems (She/They) 00:36, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

[edit]


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

SirGallantThe4th (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It’s all my fault, I’m sorry. I was trying to make a stupid joke because HackerKnownAs was getting sanctioned by a suspicious IP editor sonI thought it would be funny to make a new account (Andthewinnerisme) and pretend like I was another one. I didn’t mean any harm or anything, I just felt so uncomfortable after seeing that someone was looking through my profile and trying to antagonize me, and we thought that person was using sockpuppets to make me feel worse. I was meeting him in person since we recognized each other outside of Discord and had planned to meet up over a week ago, before any of the admin discussion. I can post my proof as well (but it has private information, so it will have to be through something else), and I didn’t think that this could get us both banned. As for Rin6626, that was an account made by a younger friend who knew about the drama and was meeting me too, we didn’t know about this account until much later. Again, I’m really sorry. I deserve the block but I didn’t mean to cause any harm. Please unblock HKA at the very least, he really didn’t do anything wrong and was only trying to defend me.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It’s all my fault, I’m sorry. I was trying to make a stupid joke because HackerKnownAs was getting sanctioned by a suspicious IP editor sonI thought it would be funny to make a new account (Andthewinnerisme) and pretend like I was another one. I didn’t mean any harm or anything, I just felt so uncomfortable after seeing that someone was looking through my profile and trying to antagonize me, and we thought that person was using sockpuppets to make me feel worse. I was meeting him in person since we recognized each other outside of Discord and had planned to meet up over a week ago, before any of the admin discussion. I can post my proof as well (but it has private information, so it will have to be through something else), and I didn’t think that this could get us both banned. As for Rin6626, that was an account made by a younger friend who knew about the drama and was meeting me too, we didn’t know about this account until much later. Again, I’m really sorry. I deserve the block but I didn’t mean to cause any harm. Please unblock HKA at the very least, he really didn’t do anything wrong and was only trying to defend me. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=It’s all my fault, I’m sorry. I was trying to make a stupid joke because HackerKnownAs was getting sanctioned by a suspicious IP editor sonI thought it would be funny to make a new account (Andthewinnerisme) and pretend like I was another one. I didn’t mean any harm or anything, I just felt so uncomfortable after seeing that someone was looking through my profile and trying to antagonize me, and we thought that person was using sockpuppets to make me feel worse. I was meeting him in person since we recognized each other outside of Discord and had planned to meet up over a week ago, before any of the admin discussion. I can post my proof as well (but it has private information, so it will have to be through something else), and I didn’t think that this could get us both banned. As for Rin6626, that was an account made by a younger friend who knew about the drama and was meeting me too, we didn’t know about this account until much later. Again, I’m really sorry. I deserve the block but I didn’t mean to cause any harm. Please unblock HKA at the very least, he really didn’t do anything wrong and was only trying to defend me. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=It’s all my fault, I’m sorry. I was trying to make a stupid joke because HackerKnownAs was getting sanctioned by a suspicious IP editor sonI thought it would be funny to make a new account (Andthewinnerisme) and pretend like I was another one. I didn’t mean any harm or anything, I just felt so uncomfortable after seeing that someone was looking through my profile and trying to antagonize me, and we thought that person was using sockpuppets to make me feel worse. I was meeting him in person since we recognized each other outside of Discord and had planned to meet up over a week ago, before any of the admin discussion. I can post my proof as well (but it has private information, so it will have to be through something else), and I didn’t think that this could get us both banned. As for Rin6626, that was an account made by a younger friend who knew about the drama and was meeting me too, we didn’t know about this account until much later. Again, I’m really sorry. I deserve the block but I didn’t mean to cause any harm. Please unblock HKA at the very least, he really didn’t do anything wrong and was only trying to defend me. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
And the two IPs, 12.188.169.2 and 198.136.190.5? How did they get involved? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t know anything about them. There’s a lot of IP accounts that are harassing us, especially HKA. That’s why I made a joke account in the first place. 03:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)~ SirGallantThe4th (talk) 03:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If it might explain something, we were using a shared iPhone and laptop that our friends were also using for the whole week. All I know is that one night I decided to use the phone to make the account, and when I woke up everyone who used the phone got banned. But I don’t know anything about those IP accounts. 04:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)~ SirGallantThe4th (talk) 04:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As the person that was subjected to the targetting by these socks, I want to say that I find the notion that your friend Rin6626 made the account without any prompting or awareness of it by you both dubious. That you, as a joke apparently, created a blatantly suspicious account and used it to support a siteban of HKA (a stance that I hadn't even taken myself at that time), looks an awful lot less like a joke and more like an orchestrated attempt to get me blocked by giving credence to Rin6626's claims. Brocade River Poems (She/They) 05:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I said my piece. We had a group of people traveling with us who were aware of the Wikipedia drama but I never prompted anyone directly. The only thing I said about this was that I felt uncomfortable since I felt like I was being harassed by you and other IP editors. I don’t care if you believe me or not, it’s the truth and I can’t control what they do on their own will. ~~ SirGallantThe4th (talk) 07:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]