User talk:Sintermerte

December 2010

With this edit you re-opened a closed AfD discussion so that you could add a comment. Don't do that. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:46, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BeyondMyKen. 1st You get me rampant like a rooster with your "don't" without clarification as to the reason(s). 2nd All the more so with your surmising "so that you could" as if i were an infant. I am f*-in granny! (so don't gimme no shit: i have less trouble flooring you than any of my grandchildren; both of whom have just graduated from kindergarten and entered primary school - they can effortlessly exasperate and leave me breathless within half an afternoon) Which leads me to item: 3rd What on earth is "a closed AfD discussion" for devil's/Heaven's/fuck's sake (i am, like i said, an example of ye olde farte and not very knowledgeable whereas newspeak, internet- and/or software-lingo, nor their abbreveations are concerned).

I was merely hinting to the fact that a view on money -whether it be true or false- can be rather important in analysis.

Shaksper painted a wrongful portrait of Dick III - but a beaut!

Furthermore: any closed dicussion can be re-opened. For whatever reason. Sintermerte (talk) 01:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sintermerte. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! – S. Rich (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ontology has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ontology was changed by Sintermerte (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860389 on 2016-05-12T02:22:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=2oczE7SODTUnF5j_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_blLJ4nDcDslnceF&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 20:40, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Unfinished creative work. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:05, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In answer to your question on my talk page, this edit appears to be your personal opinion and conclusion. It is unsourced. Citations of reliable sources are needed to demonstrate that material is verifiable, and not merely the editor's opinion. It is also necessary to write in neutral language showing that the prior text is a minority or fringe opinion and not simply a conclusion that it is "nonsense", which perhaps it is but that way of expressing is not in line with the guidelines. See Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Donner60 (talk) 03:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Netherlands Carillon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asten (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Double-decker bus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Live and Let Die (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Church

Hi! I reverted your edit to Catholic Church. I don't know if you noticed, but right beside the text you changed is a note: . Actually, "catholic" (lowercase) means the things you said; "Catholic", in common use as part of a proper noun, refers to the church in question here. If you want to discuss it, please come to the article's Talk page. Cheers! — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 14:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Signing in articles

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Radical skepticism. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article? Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephan Farffler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Altdorf.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1st: what's the problem, if any?

2nd: on the page i already hinted at "- may 3;-) need some serious editing"

3rd: bother me not, you eff-ing robot; i talk to people, not machines

Sintermerte (talk) 14:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]