User talk:SingingSenator

Singing Senators

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Singing Senators, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: The Singing Senators. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Battle of Antwerp

A tag has been placed on Battle of Antwerp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 16:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dan Eggen (journalist)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dan Eggen (journalist), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Nick Garvey (talk) 02:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to 1996 RNC article

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to 1996 Republican National Convention. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. -choster (talk) 01:47, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- ChrisO (talk) 09:01, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Clear Channel Communications‎ . If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kuru ^talk 11:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Omar Khadr. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. // Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 13:00, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You were warned. I've reviewed your edits, and it seems you're doing nothing but trolling Wikipedia and vandalising articles. -- ChrisO (talk) 23:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about J. William Leonard

Hello, SingingSenator, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. William Leonard whether the article J. William Leonard should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving J. William Leonard, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Night of the Big Wind _talk 15:42, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]