User talk:Simultaneous movement

Welcome!

Hello, Simultaneous movement, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 03:38, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.yourtaxsavings.com/federal-reserve/89/federal-reserve-board-abolition-act-of-2007. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Libertarianism and rights

Hi there. I want to thank you for your recent edit to Natural and legal rights; however, I do have some concerns about it, and some suggestions for improving it. It is placed at the end of the History section, where it does fit chronologically (though it is not explicitly dated). However, it does not seem to fit there properly; the segue from the rest of the history is nonexistent and jarring.

I'm also slightly wondering about the notability of it; it does seem to present a different point of view not precisely covered elsewhere in the article - the view that rights are alienable but only by their owners - but it does not seem substantially different from the standard view of inalienability (nobody argues that peoples' inalienable rights over themselves are absolute to the point of making there no such thing as morally justified punishment), and refers especially to one particular self-published work from 1970.

I think perhaps working in some more recent history of libertarian and anarcho-capitalist thought, to fill in the gaps between the Declaration of Independence and this relatively recent book, might help both with the notability issue and with the segue from the rest of the history section. Since this seems to be a topic of interest for you, I wondered if you might want to help in that regard?

Thanks, -Pfhorrest (talk) 06:28, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NFCC#9

The policy is currently very clear that fair use images should never be used on portals. Please do not replace these images. --Onorem ♠Dil 13:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Ald...uh EVC...*cough* "simultaneous movement", you are going to attract attention fairly quickly if you continue to use non-free images outside of article space. As the dude says, this policy is not one to be compromised on, so I'd say focus your efforts elsewehere. the skomorokh 17:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite block

This user has been "infinite" blocked by User:Sarcasticidealist for "abusing multiple accounts." --Abd (talk) 13:49, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's an indefinite rather than infinite block, meaning that any admin can lift it at a time of their choosing. the skomorokh 14:07, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

read the block long, it says "infinite." Moot point, to be sure. --Abd (talk) 23:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Marc Montoni

I have nominated Marc Montoni, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Montoni. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. the skomorokh 14:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]