The latest update was late because my internet was not working one night, then my laptop overheated the next night. --Simspartan (talk) 02:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

peer review

With the entire article everything looked to be very good. All the information was present and correct. I really like the description section and the Taxonomy section as well. The information regarding the hybrid species was very interesting and something that is very key in the identity of the plant. What really impressed me with this article is that it is very well organized, just more information with the introductory section as well distribution and Uses. Arbroome (talk) 22:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With the article, all current information now is very well fitting to the article, additional information should be added to every section to perhaps elaborate on the current information already present in the article. Once these changes are made it will very much be a great improvement to the article. Arbroome (talk) 22:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The most important thing that can be done is just add more information to meet the word limit (1200) especially add more information on the distribution and uses. Arbroome (talk) 22:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe with my article I could look into my species distribution more and perhaps add more information to whether there are hybrid species as well. The neatness of the article as well as structure is something that I could perhaps better incorporate in my article. Arbroome (talk) 22:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With the word count I came to a total of 875 words, short of the 1200. But if you had information to the Introduction, Distribution, and Uses section then you should be closer to the 1200 word limit. But other than the word count you have made a great start for the article!! Arbroome (talk) 22:11, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]