User talk:SimplySage

Judy Mikovits

You marked an edit as a "minor edit" when it was actually a substantive edit. According to Help:Minor edit"

"Checking the minor edit box signifies that the current and previous versions differ only superficially (typographical corrections, etc.), in a way that no editor would be expected to regard as disputable. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if the edit concerns a single word, and it is improper to mark such an edit as minor."

The fact that your edit was reverted within one minute is strong evidence that your edit was not minor. Your changes are contentious and not minor. Please gain consensus on the article's talk page before making any further changes to the article. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Slave owner

Follow up to Talk:George_Clymer: To make this claim on Wikipedia requires a secondary source. Had I not removed it someone else would have eventually. The problem is it is going against the grain of what Wikipedia is: a secondary-sourced-based encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a place to advance new unpublished research findings. It's a feature not a bug. If this finding is published in a journal or book, great! -- GreenC 05:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Found and added a secondary source confirming he owned a slave, if briefly, at a young age. George_Clymer#Slavery -- GreenC 06:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just for context, this primary source URL was originally here on this page before I made an edit. It was used as evidence to the contrary, which simply seemed inaccurate. SimplySage (talk) 17:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AGI House (San Francisco) (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AGI House (San Francisco) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 06:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SimplySage! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 06:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]