User talk:Simone Nicolescot

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Simone Nicolescot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unifight article

Hello! After your comment on my talk page, I took the liberty of re-writing the lead paragraph of the Unifight article - I hope you find it acceptable.

I would suggest that you add some in-line citations or footnotes in the section Unifight#Technique; see Wikipedia:Tutorial_(Citing_sources). The article has one already in the 'History' section concerning the European Unifight Federation and several in the 'Championships' section.

Good Luck with the article! jmcw (talk) 11:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for help on this article. What kind of citations could I add in Unifight technique section ? I don't see, really. The only document I have about technique is Unifight rules, in .pdf format. I will add a link to Downloads page on Unifight European Federation, I hope it will be ok. Simone Nicolescot (talk) 22:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The article looks much better with the media citations. I'll remove the tags. jmcw (talk) 20:24, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The sources do show a level of notability but more sourcing is still a good thing, and certain kinds of statements, controversial or particularly relevant (such as military origins of a martial art) need a sources, this is to prevent every art claiming it dose for promotional reasons. Similarly promotional type material is not allowed in, or linked from articles, unless there is a good reason, e.g. dissuasion of a specific advert. --Nate ^t/_c 09:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the way it reads (especial with the link farm at he bottom) is is not ideal. The tags art there to flag up issues with the article, it does need more sources, there are list that could better be shown as prose and in general the article could be better formatted. The tags are their because they flag the article up in lists of articles that need improvement, some editors work by going through these lists so it will simply attract more people to improve the article. --Nate ^t/_c 14:07, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may also wish to read about reliable sources the link you have added to cite military applications is a primary source so not usable in this context. --Nate ^t/_c 14:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Simone! Don't get so upset about the tags: they are the usual way to work on improving an article. Nate is a very experienced editor - he will help you move this article along to better quality. Relax, this is how Wikipedia works! jmcw (talk) 14:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately my French is virtualy non-existent, last use was @ school 10+ years ago, so i have forgotten most of the grammar and have no appropriate vocabulary.

Back on topic the links you have added back make sense, it was the long list including links to youtube promotional video's that looked out of place. --Nate ^t/_c 09:44, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Unifight Special Forces 2008.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Unifight Special Forces 2008.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:17, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it will be all right now, I add information missing Simone Nicolescot (talk) 13:33, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it looks like you have done what was necessary - it should be OK now. Well done. Pdfpdf (talk) 14:05, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sergey Novikov

[1] gives his country as 'URS'. [2] says he is Russian. [3] You say he is Ukrainian. I do not understand.

A second problem (and the reason for the tag): you say Unifight was created out of German military traning programs.[4]. Some anonymous IP is saying other countries. Could you please find a reference (from a third party, not Unifight) that make clear where Unifight was founded and by whom? There must be some international newspaper or fight magazine with an article about Unifight: this would make the article very strong. The country and founder need to be referenced to stop this slow edit war. jmcw (talk) 13:59, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About Serhiy Novikov : the Wikipedia page about him (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serhiy_Novikov), NOT MAKE by me, tells clearelly that M. Novikov is Ukrainean (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Novikov). I know personnally M. Novikov very well, and I know also he is ukrainean. He fight for URSS and win Olympic Championship for URSS because at this time Ukraine was a soviet republic, not independent like now.

About Unifight origin : I will give you some links in romanian language from newspapers for confirm :

http://www.sfin.ro/articol_11210/unifight_arta_martiala_rambo.html (second paragraph) http://www.9am.ro/stiri-revista-presei/2007-11-24/unifight-in-drum-spre-jo-2012.html (second paragraph) http://www.sasori.ro/stiluri-view/Unifight.28.html http://www.romanialibera.ro/actualitate/sport/unifight-in-drum-spre-jo-2012-112132.html

About M. Anton MURARU, he developp on this page (http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilizator:MURARU) the history of Unifight.

I hope it will be enough ) --Simone Nicolescot (talk) 05:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Simone! I think you have not yet understood Wikipedia:Reliable sources. "The word "source" as used on Wikipedia has three related meanings: the piece of work itself (the article, book), the creator of the work (the writer, journalist), and the publisher of the work (The New York Times, Cambridge University Press). All three can affect reliability."

Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Self-published web sites are not reliable. A newspaper with unknown editorial policy is not reliable. An organization web site can be used only in limited cases (see Wikipedia:PRIMARY#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources). A foreign language source is not automatically unreliable but it is difficult to determine the reliability of the writer and publisher.

The current references are good as supporting material but the article does not yet have one Wiki Reliable Source. You need to find a description of Unifight written in English and published by a well-know publisher. Good luck! jmcw (talk) 20:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look at Wikipedia:Verifiability - it is easier to read<g>. jmcw (talk) 20:07, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Serguei Novikov wikipedia.jpg

The file File:Serguei Novikov wikipedia.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Serguei Novikov.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]