User talk:Simon123

Unitised insurance fund

Hi, any chance you could clarify the 2nd sentence in the Unitised insurance fund article? What do you mean by "British Isles offshore jurisdictions". Thank you. --Bardcom (talk) 17:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for that. Is this type of fund a particularly British fund? In particular, which offshore financial centers typically offer this fund? It's difficult to find references. Thank you. --Bardcom (talk) 00:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi, if you get the time, would it make more sense to list the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands rather than say British Isles offshore - or does Dublin get used for this sort of stuff? --HighKing (talk) 21:40, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Robert Mugabe NPOV tag

Hi, you have removed my NPOV tag several times for no apparent reason. Have you read the article? I'm sorry but I can't see any Zanu-PF replies or information vaguely supporting him. However, it gets a lot worse because a lot of this article is simply written in a tone which is unbelievably anti-Mugabe. People can get this kind of information in their newspapers. The current media situtaion in and around Zimbabwe isn't helping us to formulate an article which is NPOV, but we need to adress the situation of neutrality. Besides, there is already a discussion which has been going on for some time which proves that the tag is accurate as the NPOV IS DISPUTED on the discussion page. Even if there was no problem with it, you will still have to wait until the DISPUTE IS RESOLVED before removing the tag as if nothing was wrong. "Marxist one-party regime"? I don't think so. We are dealing with some kind of sock-puppetry of the MDC, or perhaps someone who believes everything that is written in the newspapers. WP:Zim must deal with this problem before it gets massively out of hand.--HandGrenadePins (talk) 18:12, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry about swearing as I have already tried to suggest. But in no way does Robert Mugabe lead a "marxist one party regime". He is social democratic but not marxist. If he was officially marxist would he be leading a parliamentary democracy? (as far as we are concerned the fact that it his legitimacy is in question is irrelevent) Mugabe has not declared himself as in any way communist and follows democratic practices. You seem to suggest that I will not be using "RELIABLE sources for my arguments. What do you quite mean by this word "reliable". (yes I have read the page, before you start saying I'm a newbie with no brains.) Do you mean anti-Mugabe? I think you do:(. [1] This quite clearly illustrates that the media bias around Zimbabwe is being purpotrated by Western media as well as the state-run media. The problem is that we do not read the state-owned media because we see it as "propaganda", whilst we read gladly the media which told us that Native Americans were savages, Blacks should always be slaves, the Golf of Tonkin incident, and the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. If you read the article you would notice that it talks about "international" (i.e. Western) reaction to Mugabe's actions, while never ever giving a reply from Mugabe sympathizers. The only reply I can find is one which says that Tsvangirai deserved to be beaten, perhaps to portray them as brutal. PS - I will copy and paste this into the discussion.

By the way, I am not the only person on the discussion page who wishes to have a NPOV tag. As I said, this marks a DISPUTE, and there is quite clearly a dispute since before I placed a NPOV tag there.--HandGrenadePins (talk) 18:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Intaglio (software)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Intaglio (software), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TN‑X-Man 16:35, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Photogenics

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Photogenics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. GDallimore (Talk) 09:28, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:TennisGirl thumb.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TennisGirl thumb.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Simon123! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Terry O'Neill (karateka) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gail-porter-stunt-marketing.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gail-porter-stunt-marketing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

OIEC

I'm planning to move ICVC back to OEIC because OEIC is by far the dominant usage and dominant usage is preferred over the most strictly technically correct. This will undo the opposite move that you did back in 2005. Please let me know if you agree, disagree about OEIC being the most common term or disagree for some other reason. Jamesday (talk) 15:42, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject East Anglia

Would you be interested in WikiProject East Anglia?

If yes, please support us here at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/East Anglia. Wilbysuffolk talk 07:47, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Equity release

The article Equity release has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

advertising feature

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Equity release

The article Equity release has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

seems to be a bit of rather sneaky spam unref beyond spam links; mainly copied from http://www.whatisequityrelease.info/what_is_equity_release.htm- (a previous PROD was removed by a now permanently-banned sockpuppet)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 08:45, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Bank rate

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bank rate, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. greenrd (talk) 17:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Brevan Howard Page Update

Hi Simon,

I see you have an interest in both finance and financial based Wikipedia pages and I'm getting in touch as I was wondering if you could help me out with the Brevan Howard article? They're one of the largest hedge funds in the world, but their Wikipedia page has a number of factual inaccuracies in it. The talk page clearly identifies all of the inaccuracies, backed up with sources. The user page of the previous editor who was helping out says he is taking a long break from Wiki, and the page hasn't attracted any new editors since October 2013.

It would be very much appreciated if you could lend a hand on this --Jenny.barrett (talk) 12:31, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Simon123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:SKI Kata Vol 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SKI Kata Vol 1.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Simon123. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Standard notice of ArbCom discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Newimpartial (talk) 18:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marabba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karam. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)