User talk:Silver Manowar

Welcome!

Hello, Silver Manowar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

November 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Greeks, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Caution for unexplained removal of sourced content. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 22:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A source being slightly older than another one is NOT a valid reason for removal. Your edit, which is not a minor change but a major one, has been challenged, so take it to the talk page of the article and get support from other editors before making it again! - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 10:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Greeks, you may be blocked from editing. Warning for repeated unexplained removal of sourced content (with a misleading edit summary to boot, since there's nothing in archive 8 about this...). - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 16:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Greeks shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 16:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]