User talk:Silver163

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North american solutions

Someone has nominated for deletion North american solutions, an article that you worked on. ErikHaugen (talk) 16:25, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments at Daniel Colegrove AFD

These comments [1] are irrelevant to the deletion discussion. Please do not repost them. I'm sorry if my comment gave you the impression that how the article came to be was relevant. It was not intended that way. The only issue is whether he is notable.--Chaser (talk) 07:01, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brit Morin Plagiarism section

I noticed you undid my deletion of the Plagiarism section that you had added. I don't agree that this section meets Wikipedia BLP guidelines because it is contentious material, it's not written in the spirit or tone of neutrality, and it cites as its sources highly opinionated blog posts. So I have asked for additional opinions on the matter on the Brit Morin talk page. JNorman704 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To further clarify, plagiarism is a serious charge to make, and the site Brit Morin founded, Brit + Co., is up front about being a 'content curator,' something Mashable says everyone on the Web is in the Pinterest era. See http://mashable.com/2013/05/09/curator/. So the Plagiarism charge seems to me to be unfairly targeting Morin. I felt that deleting it was justified based on this from WP:BLP: "Contentious material about living persons (or in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." JNorman704 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:56, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ellen Pao

Hello, I'm Kungming2. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. –- kungming·2 04:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, I'm Dolescum. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Muhammad because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dolescum (talk) 23:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gawker Media. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Reach Out to the Truth 00:57, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 03:05, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]