User talk:Silkyshiney

March 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. - Sinneed 14:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Kent Emmons appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. - Sinneed 14:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please give a read to wp:conflict of interest, wp:sock puppetry and wp:single-purpose account. If you have created this account after receiving a final warning on another account, please consider this note a final warning. If you have done so and are considering creating ANOTHER account to continue to introduce spam (advertising) into Wikipedia, please understand that I will take action under wp:SOCK right away.- Sinneed 14:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Kent Emmons, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Leave the tags in the article. - Sinneed 12:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Kent Emmons. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. - Sinneed 12:57, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 14:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaulshikha for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. - Sinneed 14:01, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]