User talk:Significantfigure/sandbox

Peer review

I think you have some good ideas with what you are going to be putting in your site, and the sources seem like valid sources to be using! Wikiassign247 (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC) I also think you have some really good sources to use for Katherine Foot, now it's just time to get some information down about her, that way content and structure can progress. SFPSMC (talk) 03:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC) You have really good information so far and I think that once you add in your remaining sources, it will be a well rounded essay. It is informational and to the point. There are few small changes to grammar I would make: first, instead of "She did go on to study" maybe just say "She went on to study." Also the wording of the sentence "Strobell and Foot were two of the first people to photograph their research samples and invented a way to make tiny samples of material at low temperatures under the microscope," is a little confusing. Maybe split the sentence up into two parts or explain more about what they photographed to connect the ideas better. Other than that, I think you did a good job with what you have so far! Potassiumfluoride (talk) 04:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  @Wikiassign247: and @SFPSMC: Thank you for your feedback! I have edited Foot's article recently and added 
  information from the sources I cited. 
  @Potassiumfluoride: I used your grammar suggestions to improve my article. I also put more explanation in about what they 
  photographed under the microscope. Thank you! 
  Significantfigure (talk) 21:39, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Significantfigure[reply]