User talk:Signalfire2000

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Signalfire2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! PDCook (talk) 03:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Signalfire2000. You have new messages at Pdcook's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

PDCook (talk) 14:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

First, I wanted to say that the Vladimir Littauer article you created is very well written. I wish all new articles were that good. Also, thank you for providing sources. I just wanted to point out that there are very useful citation templates found here. There are specific templates for books, articles, website, etc. Just copy and paste the template between the <ref> and </ref> tags in the article and then fill in the information (you don't have to fill in all of the info, but the more complete the better). You don't have to do them this way, but it is the preferred way to cite in Wikipedia articles. I went ahead and did this for the NY Times obituary you cited as an example. Happy editing! PDCook (talk) 16:32, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that a couple of the references in this article are personal communications. These are not considered reliable sources, because they are not verifiable. I would recommend either removing material sourced to personal communications or finding a reliable source that supports the information. If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page. Regards, PDCook (talk) 18:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed from the article any information sourced to such personal communications. I don't think it negatively affected the article. I also broke things up into more sections. Please feel free to add to/change the article, but be sure any additions are sourced to reliable sources. Regards, PDCook (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Signalfire2000. You have new messages at Pdcook's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

PDCook (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, thank you!

I just wanted to say again that I thought the article is well written. I should mention that the article has already been rated a B or C class by the Equine Wikiproject. B or C is actually pretty good; most new articles are rated stub or start class, so with a little more properly cited detail, this article could be rated even higher. I encourage you to keep writing articles, if you so desire! Regards, PDCook (talk) 18:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

American National Riding Commission, Inc. (ANRC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of American National Riding Commission, Inc. (ANRC), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.anrc.org/section.asp?section_id=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you have the email from the website which you copied the material from, and this is a good start, but since we have no way of verifying your account information, we require a slightly more formal process than simply pasting the contents of the email onto the article's talk page. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials and follow the instructions listed there, or rather have the copyright holder send the email as described there. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update regarding copyright concern

Since we do not yet have verification of permission by the processes set out above and sufficient time has passed since the placement of the notice, the article has been deleted for copyright concerns. This deletion is not necessarily permanent. If you have already sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) and GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (if you are not the copyright holder or have co-authored the material, release under CC-BY-SA-compatible license alone is sufficient), the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed by the Wikimedia Communications committee. Likewise, if you have not yet sent a letter, you still may (or resend it, if you believe your original may have been lost), and the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed.

As Wikipedia does not require proof of identity on account creation, it is essential that we receive external proof of authorization in order to ensure that we remain compliant with US Copyright law. It is also essential that we verify that copyright holders understand the extent of the release they are authorizing, in that our licenses permit modification and reuse in any forum, even commercial publication, as long as authorship credit is maintained and future copies are compatibly licensed.

Please note that once permission is verified, the material may be evaluated and altered to meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Although we appreciate donations, we cannot guarantee that material donated will be retained.

If you have questions about the verification procedure, please feel free to contact me at my talk page. Alternatively, you might address them at the talk page of the copyright policy, which is generally monitored by volunteers experienced in processing such matters. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:28, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Martha Lucas Pate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JayJay^{What did I do?} 16:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Signalfire2000. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]