User talk:Sigmaxalpha

Please slow down

Hi Sigmaxalpha and welcome. I noticed that most of your contributions were adding the {{cn}} tag to articles. Please slow down. For example, in this edit, this edit, and this edit, you added the tag to the lead. Please see WP:CITELEAD; this is not necessary. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 09:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sir thank you for your guidance. 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 09:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir there is an article page name Impericon has many error’s please take right decision.

my opinion - it’s totally against Notablity 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 09:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated that article for deletion here. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 15:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sir Please tell me why I am blocked from editing ? 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 13:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sir I received a msg from one of the wiki administrator

•he ask me for if I getting paid from anyone please disclose•

but I am not getting paid for my contribution. 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 04:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello Sigmaxalpha. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sigmaxalpha. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sigmaxalpha|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Graham87 (talk) 18:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sir I am paid contributor yet but if I will paid by anyone i will definitely add disclosure on my user page.

• Note- I am Trying to contribute minor things you can check if any of my edit is Looks paid please revert and inform to me.

thank you 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 04:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean to say that I am Not a paid contributor yet. 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 04:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify what you mean by 'yet'? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 05:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Sir I mean I have not any offer received by any company or organisation if I got I will inform or add disclosure on my user page. 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 05:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then, thanks for confirming. Also, no need for 'sir', we're all equal here. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 05:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou! For your kind behaviour. 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 05:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check this page Reference

Philippe Chabot I think it’s invalid. 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It works fine. Questions like this go to the teahouse. Graham87 (talk) 06:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think your level of English is good enough for this place. Please edit the Hindi Wikipedia. I just have a ... really weird feeling about you. How did you come to create your user page? Graham87 (talk) 06:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually No, it's not like that, I'm not writting big statements or comments and I didn't pay attention to grammar. 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 08:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yea! I know I am only taking help from User:CanonNi thankyou! 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 08:17, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're not taking help from anybody now; I've blocked you because your attitude is incompatible with writing an encyclopedia. Graham87 (talk) 08:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked me from Wikipedia

Disruptive editing but please check if I have done any invalid contribution.

𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 13:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution

Hello! Please check my contributions if you find any error or Mistake please tell me or revert the edit. 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 05:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 08:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! @Graham87 Sir I think you have not taken right decision, because till now check my contribution, if I have done something wrong then don't unblock but if I have done right then please unblock.

Thankyou! 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 13:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sigmaxalpha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello! @Graham87 Sir I think you have not taken right decision, because till now check my contribution, if I have done something wrong then no need to unblock but if I have done right and follow guidelines of Wikipedia then please try unblock.

Thankyou! 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 15:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you have specifically asked that *I* review my own block and that you don't want a review from other administrators (contrary to the purpose of the unblock template), well, your wish is my command. Unblock declined. I will not waste the time of the admins who patrol the unblock request category with such a frivolous request. Graham87 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Who assigned you as a admin ? 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 17:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That information is publicly available and, for your purposes, completely irrelevant, so I'll let you figure out the answer to that question yourself. At least I'm giving a more straightforward answer than you did to my question about the creation of your user page up above. Graham87 (talk) 18:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look, first of all, no matter how much dam you guys build, I can contribute at any time no need sympathy of yours. Second, you are taking personal revenge.

note- I followed the wiki guidelines 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think you can restrict editing privileges by blocking accounts or blocking IPs? If it feels like this then it is wrong I have come to contribute right or good and you should have welcomed me but you did wrong. 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 17:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your above message makes absolutely no sense, further proving that you shouldn't be editing here. Regarding your second-last message, you've followed the guidelines' letter, not their spirit, as you probably know. Paid editing is not looked upon kindly on this site. Graham87 (talk) 18:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Please give me One more Chance to edit and I will also add Paid Disclosure. 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 (talk) 18:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Graham87 (talk) 18:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Graham87 (talk) 18:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

Hello, I've decided to give you another chance at editing, should you choose to take it. If you do, please try to make edits to topics that genuinely interest you; you'll have a lot more fun that way. Your username came up in an administrators' incidents noticeboard thread about my blocking pattern and it was pointed out that I treated you particularly poorly, for which I apologise. Graham87 (talk) 08:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]