Jump to content

User talk:Sidpickle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Sidpickle, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

As you have just started editing, I hope you find the following selection of links helpful and that they provide you with some ideas for how to get the best out of Wikipedia.

Happy editing! Fæ (talk) 16:04, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

re: facility management

[edit]

Hi - thanks for the message. Sometimes a pruning is needed, and that article certainly needed one. (No reference to industrial hygiene? Come on.)

Don't despair! You can look in the article's history to add back parts of it, or you can add fresh, new content. I suggest the latter, because there were two or three sections in there with spam links to sell industrial mops and trash cans (at least I thought that thing was a trash can). Generally, an overview article like this one should briefly cover the various disciplines, with more specific content to be found in the articles for those topics. As it was, it was a list followed by some original research about what that editor thought facility management should be - things like, "we can therefore conclude...".

If I can help or answer questions, let me know. It's easy for an article like that to get really long without saying anything at all, so be mindful of that. Thanks again. :-) KrakatoaKatie 19:18, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again - sure, anyone can contribute, as long as they understand that the standard here at Wikipedia isn't truth. It's verifiability. We are not the publisher of first instance, which means we can't use original research, we insist on sticking to neutral point-of-view, and that all material submitted here should be attributed to a independent, reliable source. We have world-class scientists and engineers working on Wikipedia articles who completely get that part, and they understand that their contributions here must have references in reliable publications with which they have no affiliation. Some people, though, can't get past it - they're firm believers in their own education and experience, and if they write a paragraph, no one should even edit that paragraph because they're "experts". (That's interesting to me, because those guys, who in effect are saying to us, "trust me, I'm an expert," are the same ones who tell their kids that they can't trust anyone on the Internet! AARRGGHHH!)
Think of it as writing a paper with a bibliography. This paper doesn't have to go into detail about IH or safety or the other disciplines that contribute to the management of a facility, because the audience for this paper doesn't want to know how to manage a facility or a deep discussion of theories about it. They want to get an overview. And it is tough to keep it free of the self-published rambles and the spam - that's probably why I can't find a good or featured article related to this subject to show you. The closest GA I could find about management is, believe it or not, Christmas tree cultivation. Take a look at it: see how the subtopics, like pests, are briefly covered with pointers to the main articles on those topics; it's a lengthy article, but it's concise and to the point; and most importantly, look at the notes and the references. Did you ever believe there were that many published references and publications about Christmas tree cultivation? Are there that many about facility management? Probably more. I know where and what some of those are; I worked in occupational health, for a facility manager, for almost 10 years, I've been through HAZWOPER, I passed Hazmat Technician (both written and practical), I used to know 1910.120 (the parts applicable to my work) and NFPA 472 like the back of my hand and, like anyone who has ever worn bunker gear, I think Backdraft is the funniest movie ever made. Ask the next RN you see if s/he knows the difference between wet and dry sprinkler systems. ;-)
So of course, go for it, and if I can help, just ask. :-) KrakatoaKatie 23:32, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, take a look at the IH article to which I linked to in my first message up there. Here it's called industrial hygiene, but where you are it's called occupational hygiene. It's not the greatest article, but it's a pretty good example of how a topic with international differences is handled. Also take a look at the articles about hospitals and emergency services, like paramedic, emergency medical technician, and emergency department (which Americans commonly call "the emergency room", though most signage says "emergency department" or simply "emergency". That should give you a start. :-) - KrakatoaKatie 22:30, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and Merry Christmas to you! May the new year bless the world with peace and prosperity. :-) KrakatoaKatie 23:30, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel James (Phelps, Dodge/Phelps, James & Co)

[edit]

Hi, I noticed this article was moved to Article space. I also saw a note saying something about "if approved". If you intended this article to be reviewed by Articles for creation, adding the Submission template was all that was necessary. It would have eventually been moved out of your sand box. Things are really backed up right now, so it could take a week. If you want it to be reviewed by Articles for creation, I can move it to the correct location for you. If you want to leave it in Main space, I need to remove the AfC templates. The article looks like it would past with little trouble, so it's your choice. Thanks for your article. --  :- ) Don 21:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don

Sorry still finding this editing a bit confusing but you left a message suggesting a way forward with my article and my reply is YES PLEASE do what would to sort this out for me so I can get it reviewed and published if it passes.

Thanks

Ted Robbens (Sidpickle)

Ted,
Let's just leave it in Main space. People have already been picking at it, and no one has proposed deletion. That is a good thing. You seem to have some idea what you are doing, you added the Talk page template. I added an infobox, I think every article worth anything should have one. You can fill what blanks you can. I'm not sure why someone removed your picture, you can put it into the infobox if you like. The same person deleted your further reading. Since theses are Wiki-links, they would actually come under "See also". I put those back. Any questions or concerns, just tag my talk page. Happy editing. --  :- ) Don 08:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don: Thanks for the help. I think I have sorted out a few things. As you know research goes on and I will update as and when and try to link to other articles. Ted Sidpickle (talk) 13:28, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Sid,
NP. Your article is looking good. For me, research will end when they plant me. FYI, I think the lead is fine for the size of the article and the writing is not bad, so remove those tags after another few edit, and you have dropped of the tagger's radar. --  :- ) Don 15:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Sidpickle. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:39, 18 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on White Ladye - Steam Yacht

[edit]

Hello, Sidpickle! I'm Ritchie333. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about White Ladye - Steam Yacht.
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/White Ladye - Steam Yacht. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:53, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Freebirds Howdy! 14:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Teahouse Turns One!

[edit]

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


Teahouse First Birthday Badge Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! BO | Talk 11:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on George Alexander Baird - Mr Abington

[edit]

Hello, Sidpickle! I'm Huon. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about George Alexander Baird - Mr Abington.
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Alexander Baird - Mr Abington. Huon (talk) 16:18, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Sidpickle. You have new messages at OrenBochman's talk page.
Message added 23:04, 27 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

BO | Talk 23:04, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Waterwitch

[edit]

Please see my comments at Talk:HMS Waterwitch (1892). 2.101.37.82 (talk) 22:28, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 15:26, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
George Alexander Baird, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LionMans Account (talk) 03:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

George Alexander Baird

[edit]

An excellent and overdue article (a LOT better than start class btw). I created the Merry Hampton article and always found Baird fascinating: a regency rake-hell who somehow slipped through a wormhole and found himself in the late Victorian era. Tigerboy1966  22:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Captain James Octavius Machell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:55, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anna Brassey, Baroness Brassey may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |url=http://collections.rmg.co.uk/collections/objects/18812.html|accessdate=22 July 2013}}</ref> (The number of people on board was 43.<ref>[http://www.fullbooks.com/Lives-of-Girls-Who-Became-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:50, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Sidpickle. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added Dismas. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/White Ladye - Steam Yacht concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/White Ladye - Steam Yacht, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I abandoned this article and included some information about the White Ladye in an existing article instead. I did not think to delete origin so please let it be cleaned off of Wiki. Many thanks Ted Sidpickle (talk) 06:07, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Daniel James (businessman) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • in Liverpool, now in St Andrew's churchyard, West Sussex, UK. Their remains were not disturbed. (see text: "Final Resting Place"]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sidpickle (talk) 13:52, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Samuel Ford (bill discounter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newmarket (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC White Ladye - Steam Yacht was accepted

[edit]
White Ladye - Steam Yacht, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 22:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Arthur James - Coton House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norfolk Stakes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Hi im Niko. How are you? Have a good new year (Mudak568 (talk) 14:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)) Mudak568 (talk) 14:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons template

[edit]

I've added this template {{Commons category}} and it appears to work. Not my specialist area, though! Deb (talk) 10:35, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks Sidpickle (talk) 12:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Venetia James may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • s bouquet whilst Nilsson took her vows with her future husband, French banker Auguste Rouzaud.<ref>{{cite news|title=Marriage of Mademoiselle Nilsson|publisher=Birmingham Daily, Post Page 4|date=29

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:12, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Eytinge

[edit]

No worries; the current article can always be moved again. Although a better title, in that instance, might be Harry Eytinge (stage actor) to distinguish him from the other (Harry Eytinge (film actor), perhaps?]].

Keep up the good work, and happy editing! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

[edit]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Hermann Warszawiak, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

[edit]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Hermann Warszawiak, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marcellus Hartley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Paris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two Thomas Powells with the same dates?

[edit]

Hi, please see Talk:Thomas Powell (botanist); I can't tell if this is the same person as Thomas Powell (1809–1887). Ham II (talk) 09:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Daniel Macdonald (missionary)
added a link pointing to The Telegraph
John Geddie (missionary)
added a link pointing to The Telegraph

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harvey Washington Walter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page General Bragg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Solomon Beyfus (1820-1893), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Evening News. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lillie Langtry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jean Martin (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Conte. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Sidpickle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Office space planning for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Office space planning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Office space planning until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JudeccaXIII (talk) 05:07, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

William Walsh (bishop of Dover)

[edit]

Just letting you know that I have replied to your message on my talk page. Storye book (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I hadn't heard from you, and time was running out, I took the liberty of nominating the article for DYK. The nomination page is here: Template:Did you know nominations/William Walsh (bishop of Dover) or you can follow it on the talk page of the article. The article will go under review in due course, and if suggestions are made for improvement, the usual convention is that you (as the main expander of the article) are welcome to make the improvements yourself if you wish - or I can do it if you like. I hope that's OK. If the nomination is successful, you will receive your first DYK banner, posted to your talk page by admin. Storye book (talk) 20:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
FYO, the article has received a positive review from a volunteer reviewer, and now admin has put it into prep area 4 here. It will soon move up the prep page into one of the queues, and then you should be able to work out when it will appear on the front page. Storye book (talk) 10:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article should appear on DYK tomorrow 26 Feb from 12.00 midday to midnight. See Prep page. However last minute reschedulings have happened before, so if you don't want to miss the fun of seeing it there, you might want to check in the morning as well. Enjoy. Storye book (talk) 20:10, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William Walsh (bishop of Dover)

[edit]

On 26 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Walsh (bishop of Dover), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that William Walsh was Bishop of Mauritius in 1892 when the country suffered one of its worst cyclones? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Walsh (bishop of Dover). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, William Walsh (bishop of Dover)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

[edit]
The Content Creativity Barnstar
Congratulations on your first DYK, and well done for an excellent job in expanding the content of William Walsh (bishop of Dover) Storye book (talk) 12:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bloomsbury (horse)

[edit]

Thank for creating the Ridsdale article. I see you also created George Alexander Baird so rogues and rakes are obviously one of your areas of expertise. The Bloomsbury article is one of my favourites as it was such a tangled tale with conflicting sources: in the end you find you have to go with "It was claimed...", "Allegedly..." "A report stated..." because the facts of the matter are unrecoverable. I would just note that to stand out as a disreputable character on the Turf in the 1830's took some doing. Tigerboy1966  17:55, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Lillie Langtry steering a rowing boat.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lillie Langtry steering a rowing boat.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 11:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

William Mendel and Sir Alfred Newman

[edit]

Dear Ted Pickle I have read your essays with great interest. I am working on essays about Harrods Buenos Aires and have encountered these names and additional documents. Would you be interested in corresponding with me?Sexanddanger (talk) 00:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Sexanddanger[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Sidpickle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Antonio Lante Montefeltro della Rovere, III duca Lante della Rovere

[edit]

You are welcome! ;) i will provide a translation on that article as soon as possible ;) --Leopold (talk) 20:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edward German

[edit]

Your having a copy of the will is not an adequate source that we can cite per WP:V; Wikipedia relies on published information. Unless the Will has been published by (or at least quoted in) an independent, reliable source, we cannot use the information from it. Further, even if we can use the information, I am dubious that stating who he left manuscripts to is of encyclopedic interest; that seems more like information that should be put into a book about German's music, rather than a short encyclopedia article. It would probably be of more interest to cite a reliable source that lists where all of his manuscripts are now. Wikipedia works by WP:CONSENSUS, so if other editors agree with you that information is correctly referenced and encyclopedic, the information could go into the article over other editors' objection. Just by way of explanation, I am not "the keeper" of any article: Everyone can edit Wikipedia. But we can "watch" articles on our watchlist. I watch many articles about musical theatre before 1925, and when I believe that new information is not adequately referenced or WP:NOT encyclopedic, I remove it. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:24, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. It's not a question of what's merely relevant, it's a question of what's encyclopedically noteworthy. See WP:BALASP and WP:NOT. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:04, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Edith Ayrton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to East Preston
Israel Zangwill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to East Preston

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Sidpickle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Jeremiah Rotherham & Co) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Jeremiah Rotherham & Co.

User:Cwmhiraeth while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

An interesting and well-written article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: Thanks for the Jeremiah Rotherham & Co comment. Nice to get a positive response. Sidpickle (talk) 19:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strahan

[edit]

Hello! Sadly, I know nothing about this person other than what could be on this platform. Red Director (talk) 18:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:V

[edit]

If you add information to an article, please cite your sources. See WP:V for more information. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:34, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:V

[edit]

The reason why two editors have reverted your additions is that they are uncited. Any Wikipedia article, and most particularly one that has passed the reviews necessary to become a featured article, must be properly cited. I don't doubt the truth of your proposed addition, but it must be adequately cited in the form used in the rest of the article. Whether we need a picture of two blue plaques is a separate matter and would be best discussed on the article talk page. Best wishes, Tim riley talk 21:12, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barton Grindrod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Patterson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hermann Warszawiak

[edit]

Hi there,

I saw that on you article about Hermann Warszawiak you mentioned various records you used for the vital information. I am a descendant of the Warszawiak family, and I've doing a genealogical research on it, trying to build a complete tree. I was wondering if you could share these records with me.

Thank you! עמשׂ בן־אריה (talk) 21:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jane Austen's family and ancestry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stoneleigh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sidpickle&oldid=1187207868"