User talk:Sidelight12/2014

Found you!

I have found you! ;P --Goldenburg111 (talk) 21:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hey. - Sidelight 12 ^Talk 04:12, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EAZA zoo member culling practices

Hello, Sidelight12, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EAZA zoo member culling practices, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, Incidents of killing animals in zoos. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EAZA zoo member culling practices at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 05:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

note: deleted by author. - Sidelight 12 ^Talk 05:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Close paraphrasing

Just in case you missed it, I've added a comment to your post on my talk page. 62.107.210.245 (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

Hi! Would you care to vote or comment at this RfC? I noticed your name at the talk page for WP:NOR and figured you'd be an appropriate editor to ask, since the discussion concerns that policy. Dan56 (talk) 05:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC) Y[reply]

User:Valoem/UFO sightings in outer space

Hi,

User:Valoem/UFO sightings in outer space → UFO sightings in outer space

Can you help me expand and clean up this article I have added multiple citations and plan on DRVing soon. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 23:15, 23 April 2014 (UTC) Y[reply]

Thanks for your help! It's ready. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 02:46, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I contributed a little bit, based on the sources I could find, but it makes some difference. - Sidelight 12 ^Talk 08:00, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, would love your input...

It seems that disruptive IP editor is at it again. He's after the Black mamba article now. There is a discussion at the articles talk page, I would appreciate your input, or better yet, your support. Cheers. --Dendro†Naja ^{Talk to me!} 05:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think you both should compromise, otherwise the edit wars will continue for a long time. Eventually there could be a block, then there'd be hard feelings by either party. You both can contribute to it. Only, the ip editor should not be so pushy on acts, and claims. I lost track of what was going on there, just noticed an admin removed a copyvio, and most likely hid those revisions. It's still risky, because the admin could have missed something, and any editor would be responsible if they unknowingly reinstated it. I'll take a look. - Sidelight 12 ^Talk 06:23, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting admin attention regarding a user

I saw your edit at User talk:Sdksfjsdklfjakfjadksfj, which used {{admin request}}. In the future, it's likely more effective to report a user at the appropriate noticeboard. I only saw your request after the fact, having to block the user for other disruptive behavior. Cheers.—Bagumba (talk) 23:29, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I thought posting on a noticeboard would be too much hassle for a small amount of vandalism, but that's what I'll do next time. I wasn't concerned about the user being blocked as much as removing contact information from edit history [1]. - Sidelight 12 ^Talk 07:12, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO sightings in outer space (3rd nomination)

Here we go again. As my co-editor any input is appreciated. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 16:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was sent too soon. - Sidelight 12 ^Talk 09:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Benjamin Netanyahu. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to RT (TV network) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

to-air-show-hosted-by-anti-war-marine-vet/|title=KGB TV to Air Show Hosted by Anti-war Marine Vet]|publisher=[[Accuracy in Media]]|date=January 10, 2011|accessdate=05-04-11}}</ref> [[Andrey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:35, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "RT Network". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 27 October 2014.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 14:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning RT Network, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, User:TransporterMan (talk) 12:56, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, Sidelight12. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is RT (TV Network)...neutral feedback desperately needed!.The discussion is about the topic neutrality of lede. Thank you. --Kenfree (talk) 22:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]