User talk:Siddhantgoyal020784

This is Siddhantgoyal020784's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Utter WP:SPAM

Qcne (talk) 12:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Siddhantgoyal020784! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 12:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Siddhantgoyal020784/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Siddhantgoyal020784/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qcne (talk) 12:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Qcne,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I want to clarify that I am not receiving any compensation for the edits made to the Wikipedia page for Shonali. My involvement in creating the page is driven purely by my personal satisfaction with the services provided by Shonali in the form of a diet plan.

Having benefited from her expertise, I felt it would be a positive contribution to the community to share information about Shonali's work on a Wikipedia page. This was done as a goodwill gesture to acknowledge and promote the valuable services she offers.

I understand the importance of transparency and compliance with Wikipedia policies, and I want to assure you that my edits are not influenced by any financial interests. If further clarification or documentation is needed, please feel free to ask.

Thank you for your understanding.

Best regards,

Siddhantgoyal020784

Siddhantgoyal020784 (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello Siddhantgoyal020784. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to User:Siddhantgoyal020784/sandbox, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Siddhantgoyal020784. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Siddhantgoyal020784|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Qcne (talk) 12:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]