User talk:Siamak202020

January 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richmond Hill, Ontario. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tdc42 (talk) 04:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Keeping up with the Kardashians, you may be blocked from editing. PK T(alk) 12:40, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry wont happen again Siamak202020 (talk) 15:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Siamak202020, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Siamak202020! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Unsourced changes / vandalism to biography articles

I noticed today you have made several changes to articles that are biographies of living persons, without citing any source. Furthermore, they appear to be incorrect and contradict existing reliable sources in the articles, such as changing this birth date: [1], and this one: [2] which is obviously false, and changing the "spouse" information here: [3]. If you don't have valid reasons for these changes, it may be considered vandalism. Either way, if you continue to make such unsourced changes, especially in biographies, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your understanding. --IamNotU (talk) 18:14, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Oshnavieh. Tdc42 (talk) 05:54, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent disruptive editing. Some of your editing is unambiguously vandalism, and the rest is at best highly dubious editing unsupported by any sources, and completely unverifiable. If you return to editing after the block is over please make sure that you provided references to reliable sources for information you add to articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 10:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]