User talk:Siabaf

Speedy deletion nomination of Hurricane Kira

Hello Siabaf,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hurricane Kira for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Dewritech (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Siabaf. You have new messages at Dewritech's talk page.
Message added 11:45, 25 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dewritech (talk) 11:45, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:HurricaneKira.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HurricaneKira.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. GB fan 01:34, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per checkuser evidence. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:04, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]