User talk:Shwethahc

Speedy deletion nomination of Shona Chhabra

Hello Shwethahc,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shona Chhabra for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Josu4u (talk) 22:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yasmin Pathan

Hello Shwethahc,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Yasmin Pathan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Josu4u (talk) 22:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shona Chhabra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shona Chhabra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shona Chhabra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Appable (talk) 06:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yasmin Pathan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yasmin Pathan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yasmin Pathan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating our policy on use of multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 13:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shona Chhabra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shona Chhabra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shona Chhabra (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]