Jump to content

User talk:Shulalevin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, Shulalevin, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 17:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ~~~~ Shulalevin (talk) 18:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Shulalevin, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 17:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Israel Analytical Chemistry Society (IACS)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Israel Analytical Chemistry Society (IACS), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Actualcpscm (talk) 21:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isranalytica (July 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:NEVENT. The sources offered do not seem to have significant coverage of this event and mostly are associated with it, independent reliable sources should be used to establsh notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
331dot (talk) 09:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Shulalevin! Your additions to J. Calvin Giddings have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I could not figure out what was exactly copyrighted, but in any case any material on Giddings which I used is more than 25 years old, and I might have used a sentence or two from these old sources. Shulalevin (talk) 14:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Conducting a double check, I found the page is marked as being in the public domain, so I have restored what I removed. By the way the term of copyright in the United States is not 25 years; it's 70 years minimum. See the Commons:Hirtle chart for full details. — Diannaa (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Shulalevin (talk) 18:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I see that user:Diannaa recently interacted with you regarding copyright issues. I am happy to see that those issues were resolved satisfactorily.

Copyright detection tool has several recent reports regarding your edits to:

Chiral column chromatography.

Some are triggered by similarities to this article].

I don't see any evidence that the article is licensed in a way that the material can be used in Wikipedia.

Given the large number of consecutive edits by you to that article I wanted to get your feedback before determining next steps. S Philbrick(Talk) 17:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shulalevin. Since you have not responded to Sphilbrick's concerns, I have gone ahead and cleaned the article. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 11:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks S Philbrick(Talk) 12:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, User:Diannaa and User:Sphilbrick
Regarding your copyright message on my editing of the article Chiral column chromatography. Please note that this copyright note is somewhat based on a superficial observation.  My additions to the article were based on typical and conventional classifications of chiral stationary phases since the 90's. I myself had worked on these topics in the 90's, among the pioneers in the field, please see my own review: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003210245-6/role-enantioselective-liquid-chromatographic-separations-using-chiral-stationary-phases-pharmaceutical-analysis-shulamit-levin-saleh-abu-lafi
The cited article you mentioned this article]., actually used my own old materials as well, we tend to do that to one another in this field. The fact that my order of classification headers was similar to this paper's is based on the order of abundance of the classes of columns, from the most abundant to the least one, that's all. It is not special to the authors of this paper. The titles use conventional terminology. In fact, I chose this paper because they did so, using the right terminology in the right order.  I did not use my own review, and the old order, since it is somewhat outdated, and I wanted to use a more recent one.
I really made a great effort to change the wording in the paragraphs, any similarity stems from the use of conventional jargon of this field. It is really a pity that you deleted all that work, because it is not easy to get it assembled, and it seems that no one else in the world took the time and effort to do that so far. Shulalevin (talk) 14:35, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, User:Diannaa and User:Sphilbrick
Regarding your copyright message on my editing of the article Chiral column chromatography. Please note that this copyright note is somewhat based on a superficial observation.  My additions to the article were based on typical and conventional classifications of chiral stationary phases since the 90's. I myself had worked on these topics in the 90's, among the pioneers in the field, please see my own review: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003210245-6/role-enantioselective-liquid-chromatographic-separations-using-chiral-stationary-phases-pharmaceutical-analysis-shulamit-levin-saleh-abu-lafi
The cited article you mentioned this article]., actually used my own old materials as well, we tend to do that to one another in this field. The fact that my order of classification headers was similar to this paper's is based on the order of abundance of the classes of columns, from the most abundant to the least one, that's all. It is not special to the authors of this paper. The titles use conventional terminology. In fact, I chose this paper because they did so, using the right terminology in the right order.  I did not use my own review, and the old order, since it is somewhat outdated, and I wanted to use a more recent one.
I really made a great effort to change the wording in the paragraphs, any similarity stems from the use of conventional jargon of this field. It is really a pity that you deleted all that work, because it is not easy to get it assembled, and it seems that no one else in the world took the time and effort to do that so far. Shulalevin (talk) 14:35, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think Diannaa is traveling currently, although that a guess. I'm sure she will respond when she gets a chance. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
thanks. Shulalevin (talk) 14:57, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Shulalevin. Your additions to the article triggered four reports by our copyright detection service.This version of the source paper is the one that we used to do the comparison with the content you added to Wilipedia. It does not indicate that it is released under a compatible license. However, this version of the paper, which was published in the International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research, shows a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which is a compatible license, and is okay to use, as long as we provide the attribution required under the terms of the license. I am going to re-add the content and include the required attribution. Sorry for the inconvenience. — Diannaa (talk) 12:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thank you very much, I really appreciate it. Shulalevin (talk) 14:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Shulalevin! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as High-performance liquid chromatography, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://repository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/21269/1/260303221mohammed_rizwan.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:High-performance liquid chromatography saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 13:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Diannaa
I found out why there was a copyright flag. The text is from my old articles and presentations, either in my own open source former website and from my own published articles. I had an open source personal academic website, http://shula-lc.co.il/, which was removed just last year due to budget issues, because I had retired from work.  
Please see the website from the Internet archives' website:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180502104241/http://shula-lc.co.il/
This is the old version of this website from which the authors copied:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060107013350/http://www.forumsci.co.il/HPLC/
In this website I had articles which I wrote myself with Figures from my work.
The author of the manuscript you brought as a source for the copyright warning: http://repository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/21269/1/260303221mohammed_rizwan.pdf actually copied from my old materials:
Here is the presentation from which they copied figures: (they actually made cuts from them, the fonts are the same)
https://web.archive.org/web/20060510060732/http://www.forumsci.co.il/HPLC/HPLC_overview_handouts2002.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/20051016201250/http://www.forumsci.co.il/HPLC/chrometh.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20060501062636/http://www.forumsci.co.il/HPLC/Quant_SST_Val.pdf
The body of the text was copied (without any credit to me) from a draft of my article on the above old website:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180504021835/http://shula-lc.co.il/1396-2#Introduction
https://web.archive.org/web/20180504021835/http://shula-lc.co.il/1396-2#The
Alternatively they may have copied from the final manuscript of this draft, from which they copied, I can provide the pdf:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/9780470571224.pse407
Therefore, the copyright is in fact originally my own, and the text for my edits was taken from my own personal archives.  This is the reason why I was surprised by these flags.
Please bring back my edits, as it is very valuable for students, especially now that my website was shut down. I have more materials on additional equations waiting to be uploaded to this article.
Yours, Shula Levin
Shulalevin (talk) 15:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you are the copyright holder and wish to release this material under a compatible license, please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for an explanation of how to do it. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. — Diannaa (talk) 18:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply, but the materials belonged to an open-source free for all website, so there was no copyright claim on them to begin with, so there is no need to donate them to Wikipedia.
How can I get over flags pointing out to publications, which claim copyright, while using my own open-source non copyrighted materials? It won't help to donate copyright of non copyrighted open-source material which no longer exists on the web. This is a loop.
I regret to point out that this all is very discouraging. Shulalevin (talk) 08:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if you look at my archived page from whom the author of the dissertation used the materials:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060107013350/http:/www.forumsci.co.il/HPLC/
at the bottom is written:
Copyright (C)1997 Dr. Shulamit Levin
This website is intended for academic support of HPLC/LC-MS users. Shulalevin (talk) 18:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The page is clearly marked as being copyright. Your username is a match for the name of the cophyright holder, but I'm not allowed to assume that you actually are that person. We need to have documentation on file that shows you are who you say you are, and that you have agreed to release the material under a compatible license. Wikipedia has procedures in place for this purpose. Please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for an explanation of how to do it. There are several licencing choices. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. — Diannaa (talk) 19:03, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Diannaa
Hello, I understand the problem, but I it seems to be drastic to open the entire (archived) website page for anyone to use the materials in it. It is copyrighted to me only, and it is open to others with permission request and credit, which these people did not get from mehttp://repository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/21269/1/260303221mohammed_rizwan.pdf. It seems odd that I should donate my copyrighted materials to anyone upfront because of their wrong doing, especially because I am going to bring my website back to the air.
In order to solve the identity issue, I added a few links to my profile, such as Linkedin, https://www.linkedin.com/in/shulalevin/ the second Email there is the same as mine here. if this will not help, I apologize, but I will have to withdraw this editing.
Thanks for your patience. Shulalevin (talk) 11:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isranalytica (November 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KeepItGoingForward were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Citations 13 to 22 are from the organization that puts on the conference and are also used all as a reference for one citation. Use outside references to show notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KeepItGoingForward (talk) 00:13, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Israel Analytical Chemistry Society (IACS)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Shulalevin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Israel Analytical Chemistry Society (IACS), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Isranalytica

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Shulalevin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isranalytica, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Israel Analytical Chemistry Society

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Shulalevin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Israel Analytical Chemistry Society, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Israel Analytical Chemistry Society

[edit]

Hello, Shulalevin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Israel Analytical Chemistry Society".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shulalevin&oldid=1229727980"