User talk:Shubham Dhingra15s

Vivek Singh (entrepreneur) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vivek Singh (entrepreneur), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 13:45, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vivek Singh (entrepreneur) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vivek Singh (entrepreneur) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Singh (entrepreneur) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 16:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: Hi there, I am in for the discussion. I have recently made some required improvements in the subject matter as well as quoted the information from sources which are considered unpartisan and reliable. In my opinion, the article qualifies for publishing on Wikipedia. Looking forward to your thoughts.

Signing your talk page comments

Please remember to sign your talk page comments. You can do so by clicking the third from left button in the editing window menu bar, or by adding 4 ~ marks at the end of your post. With this edit, you didn't sign your post. Please be aware that pinging someone will not work if you don't sign your post. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 00:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shubham Dhingra15s. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]