User talk:Shtalic

Shtalic, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Shtalic! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne City colours

Hey Shtalic, I strongly disagree with the changing of Melbourne City's icon. The pre-existing icon better reflects the colours that Melbourne City will wear for 2016-17, before the overhaul of the A-League in the 2017-18 season. Changing their colours for this season will only cause continuity issues, I feel. Also, the icons are based moreso on the club's home colours, rather than the club's badge (which is why the Perth Glory's icon contains no orange). - J man708 (talk) 12:57, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey mate, is there a criterion for what colours a team's icon should be based on? Shtalic (talk) 13:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Home colours, generally (moreso the pattern on the home shirt, it seems {ie. Brisbane Road}). It's just that the only part of City's home kit that contains gold or red is their crest. It's probably best for the colours not to change season by season to reflect small changes in the team's kit, but with the overhaul of the league, I can see new icons possibly being needed for 2017-18. - J man708 (talk) 01:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bullshit. I won't argue it any more, though. Keep as is. Shtalic (talk) 02:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

live edits on Melbourne City

Hi,

I reverted your change for Fornaroli's goal from 3 back to 2 as the game wasn't over. Try to refrain from adding live scores and results until the match is over (I know, it's hard for me too :P) --SuperJew (talk) 11:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh mate the match was at 85'. You won't get in trouble if the rules are bent ever so slightly ;) Shtalic (talk) 11:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haha in the A-League prob not, but try that at UEFA Champions League or World Cup before the final second and 5-10 editors will scramble over each other to revert you ;) SuperJew (talk) 11:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shtalic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shtalic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]