User talk:Shrike/Archives/2012/December

Talkback

Hello, Shrike. You have new messages at Odie5533's talk page.
Message added 17:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Odie5533 (talk) 17:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Anti-Israel POV and vandalism

This important information was removed from an article by Pluto2012, despite he is the only one who inserted repeated information about territorial and demographic changes. Perhaps you could restore the missing content and finish this nonsense. Thanks.--201.231.95.189 (talk) 17:55, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Ok Shrike. I'll do it. I won't edit for six months, if you change this. Please, it's not for me. You know I'm right in this case.--201.231.95.189 (talk) 00:03, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Jerusalem, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, User:TransporterMan (talk) 22:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Grawp

Blocked, thanks for letting me know. Dougweller (talk) 07:28, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Shrike. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 18:13, 6 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your deletion of my edit in Mister X (prisoner)

The sources I added are Ha'ir and mako. Aren't they reliable? רדיומן (talk) 01:02, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 17:09, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you.Btw the talk page edit by sock can be stricken.--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 17:33, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Shrike/Archives/2012. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 01:11, 19 December 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

2012-12 request for source

Hello Shrike, Could you check the source doi:10.1177/1081180X03256999 for the claim that "A 2003 study in The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics found that Haaretz reporting was more favorable to Israelis than Palestinians and more likely to report stories from the Israeli side." ? Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 22:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

I will send you the article by mail.--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 06:37, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 22:25, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Settler colonialism

Are you certain that the Settler colonialism article is subject to 1RR? It doesn't have the Active Arbitration notice that other articles subject to that rule do.--Ubikwit (talk) 07:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)Ubikwit

..

Seasons greetings to you and yours
Dougweller (talk) 14:11, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes, a bit too late for Chanuka and not a good image for it either. I really could have used a more secular image but I love Christmas lights even if I don't agree with the religious symbolism. Dougweller (talk) 17:44, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Socks

Thanks for the info. Now I only need to figure out how to identify those socks ;) --Mor2 (talk) 19:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Revert.

Hi, I self reverted[1]. Is there anything that prevent me from reinstating it, now that 24 hours have passed? --Mor2 (talk) 06:04, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

WP:GAME if you will revert just outside of 24h they may be seen as gaming the rules.Also make a note that you self reverted on WP:ANEW--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 06:05, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

I see this report as gamin the rules. As I said to Malik [2] this is not intentional. Its morning, I haven't finished drinking my coffee, I noticed a new change popup on my watchlist, by some uninvolved user, who spoke about consensus(when there is no way in hell, he can know what he talk about, even I who have been trying to reason with Japinderum for the past weeks, have no idea what goes on in his wall of text) so I have contacted the user and explained my position [3] asking him to join the discussion and only then reverted the edit. Yes I didn't noticed that the edit from the previous day had 2 hours overlap with today... and like I said if technicality count, I don't mind to self revert/reinstate. (Besides the 'edit warring' started by Japinderum, who have reverted almost ten edits, and multiple sourced material [4] due to some perceived discussion we was having. Instead of running to file a report, I tried to explain [5])

So can I reinstate? --Mor2 (talk) 06:24, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Initiate talk page discussion first wait for a day. Do something else there are so many place that Wikipedia should be fixed.Also to tell the truth you explanation will not interest the admins the WP:1RR is a bright line that you don't cross.--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 06:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

If posted 2 hours later we wouldn't be having this discussion, so basically I was caught by a technicality and can't reinstate removed sourced martial, on which I worked for a long time? If that is the case is there a statute of limitation WP:1RR violation? --Mor2 (talk) 07:13, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello

Yes, I would like to access these articles. The page told me to contact one of the directors, and you would be one of them. These are the articles I want access to, but can't because they are either locked behind a pay wall or non-existent on the internet.

^ http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13562570120104445#preview ^ http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13531042.2011.610119 ^ Zionist "Colonialism": Myth and Dilemma, 1975

Evildoer187 (talk) 18:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

The second link is under free access just click "download full text" . I will send you the first one by mail shortly.--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 19:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Do you have access to the third one?Evildoer187 (talk) 09:56, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

I don't have access try and ask at WP:RX.--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 11:20, 30 December 2012 (UTC)