User talk:Shounak donal

Welcome to my talk page. If you want to contact me, then leave a note in this page. I don't keep all my messages, but only some selected ones.

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Anne Frank: The Whole Story, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Anne Frank: The Whole Story was changed by Shounak donal (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.900754 on 2011-05-06T08:25:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:25, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jacqueline van Maarsen

The article Jacqueline van Maarsen has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Anthem of joy (talk) 10:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rob Das

The article Rob Das has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker ^{talk to me} 15:12, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of forensic experts in C.I.D. (TV series)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, List of forensic experts in C.I.D. (TV series). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - C.I.D._(TV_series)#Forensic_experts. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at C.I.D._(TV_series)#Forensic_experts - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:53, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suzanne Friedline (actress)

The article Suzanne Friedline (actress) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. TransporterMan (TALK) 13:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Shounak donal. I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Bentogoa (talk) 12:31, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jade Williams

The article Jade Williams has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Hasteur (talk) 13:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jade Williams for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jade Williams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Williams until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hasteur (talk) 16:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template for Cultural depictions of Anne Frank

Hi, as you add more articles to Template:Cultural depictions of Anne Frank you may also wish to add the template to such articles, simply by pasting {{Cultural depictions of Anne Frank}} at the bottom of the page, just before the categories. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Politicians arrested and charges with corruption

You are invited for discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 June 1 and also Category talk:Politicians arrested and charges with corruption- . Shlok _{talk .} 18:08, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on a whether category named "Politicians arrested and charges with corruption" should deleted or not is ongoing Wikipedia at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 June 1, so if you want to share your views on this you can join the discussion.-- . Shlok _{talk .} 19:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Neha Dubey

The article Neha Dubey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no claim of notability (other than being the sister of another actress and appearances in movies), not clear how this person meets WP:BIO. Lacks references to significant coverage in 3rd party sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your new article Ali Merchant

Hi Shounak donal! I just took a look at your recently created article Ali Merchant. As you know, Wikipedia is always a work in progress. It’s nice to see you editing! Hope you’ll stick around! Jipinghe (talk) 19:38, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Dumbledore's Army

Welcome to Wikipedia. The section you recently created for Dumbledore's Army has been removed, as Nigel is a non-canon character created only for the films and never appeared in the books. Plus, the Harry Potter Wikia cannot be cited as a third-party source, as its content is strictly in-universe. sixtynine ^{• spill it •} 07:47, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userpages

Hi. You'll notice that some information has disappeared from your userpage. I'm very sorry, but trust me: this is for your own good. To learn more about why this was done, you can consult this page.

That said, you have overall been a good editor, and I invite you to continue.

(Oh, and as someone interested in Anne Frank, you may wish to read the article on Karl Silberbauer.) 15:39, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I semi-protected your user page today as it was getting some vandalism from new accounts who seemed to be trying to impersonate you. If you would rather not have this protection please let me know and I'll remove it. January (talk) 19:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Veilig Rijen

The article Veilig Rijen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A very small article on a short film without any verifiable third party sources and references. Does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Appears non-notable as it has actually no article expansion and information edit history since it was created

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheGeneralUser (talk) 16:34, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. When you recently edited Serajuddin Hossain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ayub Khan, Magura and Al-Badr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of characters in C.I.D. (TV series)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of characters in C.I.D. (TV series). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - C.I.D._(TV_series)#Cast_and_characters. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at C.I.D._(TV_series)#Cast_and_characters - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:17, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of forensic experts in C.I.D. (TV series) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of forensic experts in C.I.D. (TV series). Since you had some involvement with the List of forensic experts in C.I.D. (TV series) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:31, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of characters in C.I.D. (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of characters in C.I.D. (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters in C.I.D. (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:38, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to Research Survey

Hello Shounak donal,

I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Wikipedia editors find interesting content to contribute to Wikipedia. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Wikipedia editing. We are creating a tool, called wikiFeed, that will help Wikipedia editors make connections between content from Twitter or RSS news feeds and Wikipedia articles. We are currently gathering data which will help us in the development process and would love to learn about how you consume news content and how it relates to your Wikipedia editing. If you would like to help, follow this link to complete a brief survey. Your feedback will help us create a better tool.

For more information about wikiFeed, visit our project page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at wikifeedcc@gmail.com. Thanks for your time! Jeremey Bentham (talk) 16:22, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Priya Marathe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indian

Susannah Mushatt Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lowndes County

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Akanksha Juneja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indian

Priya Marathe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marathi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Susannah Mushatt Jones for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susannah Mushatt Jones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susannah Mushatt Jones until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 08:40, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saoirse Ronan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romantic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:03, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Akanksha Juneja, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Romantic and Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:31, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Safe Haven (novel) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Romantic, Crowbar, David Lyons and American

Amrita Mukherjee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kucch To Hai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romantic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amrita Mukherjee

The article Amrita Mukherjee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced or Unsourced article, No any reliable published sources for claims. Fails WP:V

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Chander For You 17:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Vrishasen Dabholkar

Can you please create an article on Vrishasen Dabholkar

Vrishasen Dabholkar is a known Actor in India and works in regional Television and Films (Marathi language). you can check out information about him on google with search tag "Vrishasen Dabholkar".

Vrishasen Dabholkar is a self taught Indian actro. He is best known for his role in Dahavi pha, Sameer in film Valu and as Savaji in Tukaram

Contents [hide] 1 Personal Life 2 Career 3 Television 4 References Personal Life[edit]

Vrishasen Dabholkar married his long time girlfriend, Sharada Patil who is not from the media industry, on November 19, 2013. [1] Career[edit]

Films <Marathi>: Tukaram (2012), Amhi Satpute (2009), Valu (2008), Dahavi Pha (2000)

<Hindi> Dhol (2007)

Serials/Shows<Marathi>: Jallosh Suvarnayugacha (Oct 2012- Mar2013), MissionDosti.com (April 2012- Sept 2012), Ya Walnavar (Feb 2011- Sept 2012), Tuzvin Sakhya Re (Mar 2011- Oct 2011), Hi Vaat Dur Jate (Nov 2010- Feb2011), Hya Gojirwanya Gharat (Dec 2009- Oct 2010), Kunku (April2009-Oct 2009)

Achievements:

1. Winner of UNFPA-Laadli National Creative Excellence Award for Social Change 2011 in the category of songs and lyrics ( Title -Song of Pronouns) 2. Winner of UNFPA-Laadli National Creative Excellence Award for Social Change 2008 in the category of TVC/Films.(Title– La Fille) 3. Winner of Sakaal Reflections PSA contest 2008

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.19.20.14 (talk) 06:46, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

need help Article on Vrishasen Dabholkar

need help to get this article approved http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Vrishasen_Dabholkar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.19.20.14 (talk) 10:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Archana Bhatt

The article Archana Bhatt has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 117.79.232.188 (talk) 13:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Princess Princep Shah of Nepal

Hello Shounak donal,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Princess Princep Shah of Nepal for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ketaki Chester for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ketaki Chester is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ketaki Chester until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Queen Divyeshwari of Nepal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kangra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Princess Princep Shah of Nepal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Princess Princep Shah of Nepal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Princep Shah of Nepal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 13:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Jyotshana Basnyat of Nepal

Can you edit this article?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.5.102.135 (talk) 13:02, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mamie Rearden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mamie Rearden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamie Rearden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:45, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shounak donal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shounak donal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michaela Horáková for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michaela Horáková is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michaela Horáková until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Мандичка^YO 😜 05:38, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jaroslava Siktancova for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaroslava Siktancova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaroslava Siktancova until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Мандичка^YO 😜 05:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]