User talk:Shortie43504

Welcome!

Hello, Shortie43504, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Spot "Spotty" Fetcher, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! noq (talk) 23:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spot "Spotty" Fetcher

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Spot "Spotty" Fetcher, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

this is notable how?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. noq (talk) 23:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abe Pollin copyrighted text

Your recent addition to Abe Pollin has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --AW (talk) 13:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Richard Kiel, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 19:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Miranda Cosgrove, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Kmg90 (talk) 19:27, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Drake Bell with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Atomician (talk) 19:27, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Drake Bell with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Cst17 (talk) 19:41, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Miranda Cosgrove appear to be exaggerating the extent of the accident. A broken ankle is not a severe accident, there is no evidence it endangered her career or that it is on par with the other items in the heading. Please discuss this on the talk page. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 20:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 20:40, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Miranda Cosgrove. — Jeff G. ツ 01:26, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before saving changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article T.U.F.F. Puppy, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. If I had made a mistake, please report it, remove this warning and make the edit again. Cutecutecuteface2000 (Cutecuteface needs attention) 18:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of best-selling Nintendo GameCube video games. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ ^(talk) 23:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Madden NFL 07. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Zappa O Mati 03:48, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Enough

There have been numerous warnings and requests to include sources left on your talk page. The requirement for verifiability and for including citations is not an option - you need to state your sources. If you continue to add unsourced content to articles, you will be blocked from editing. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 04:07, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]