User talk:Shooter2000

Please don't create articles about yourself. If you're notable enough, someone else will write an article about you. For the moment, I have moved the information to your User page, where you're allowed to keep some information about yourself. If you have any questions, please contact me on my Talk page. ♠P M C♠ 20:14, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Aaron Herzog

A tag has been placed on Aaron Herzog, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —B o L @ 21:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't delete your article about Mr. Herzog, C.Fred did that; I will note that as an uninvolved admin, I find that the subject is not particularly notable by Wikipedia's standards, and in my opinion it should remain deleted. If you have an additional problem, please speak to the deleting admin. ♠P M C♠ 00:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request to restore Aaron herzog

After reviewing the last version of Aaron herzog, I don't see a particular assertion of notability there. If you can explain (via my talk page) how he meets WP:BIO and what independent reliable source backs that up, then I will gladly restore the article. —C.Fred (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]