User talk:Shonzey
Shonzey, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
|
Hi Shonzey!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi Shonzey! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 03:20, Wednesday, May 6, 2015 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Just-in-Time Manufacturing
[edit]Greetings! First, I'd like to thank you for the great work that you've been doing at the article Just-in-Time Manufacturing! Anyway, I removed the last paragraph from the History section[1], since I think it's somewhat unusual to include editor's own notes to the body (we should keep an encyclopedic tone). Also, there's currently eleven sources given for the sentence "Extensive JIT/TPS implementations may be found in many case-study articles from the 1980s and beyond, with some of the standout cases included in several published books and booklets.". I haven't touched those yet, but I think the right way to proceed would be expanding the paragraph / section, and scattering those sources among more sentences, don't you think?
WP:OVERCITE provides an example of five citations for one sentence, and considers it to be "over citation", let alone the eleven citations we are having right now. I understand your point though, and I think for those different misconceptions, we should for example paraphrase or quote the sources, and then add them for the particular instances. Anyway, I thought it'd be nicer to comment on your Talk Page individually, since I really appreciate the work you are doing at the article! Consider me more as a WP:MOS man, not so much a pain in the @ss! :-D Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 18:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Just-in-Time Manufacturing may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- on JIT practices in Japan (e.g., at Toyota, Mazda, and Tokagawa Electric); another in Europe (jmg Bostrom, Lucas Electric, Cummins Engine, IBM, 3M, Datasolve Ltd., Renault, Massey-Ferguson; and
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Just-in-Time Manufacturing may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- </ref> But, as with Goddard, Plossl later wrote that “JIT is a concept whose time has come.”<ref>[Plossl. G.W. 1986. J.I.T. – fad or fact of life? ''P&IM Review and APICS News'', Feb. 1986, p.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:37, 18 May 2015 (UTC)