User talk:Shoka1234

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 07:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shoka1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Give me one last shot and if I cause another problem you can just set my ban to permanent and not reply to my appeals. I simply won't argue if an edit gets changed if unblocked. To be fair I was in a terrible situation the night where I went off, my apologies

Decline reason:

If this was a block for a one-off event then I would happily consider this request - but a quick glance over your history shows that you have regularly and repeatedly ignored Wikipedia's guidelines and abused and attacked other editors who have tried to enforce them. There doesn't seem to be any benefit to Wikipedia in giving you another chance - so I'm not. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:43, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shoka1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All 3 times were with the same person because he's biased and undoes every edit I do even if I have a source. I've made like 7 unauthorized edits as opposed to my hundreds of good edits that most members wouldn't even bother considering. I never edited maliciously, I just don't get along with 1 editor who i said i wouldn't respond to anymore if unbanned regardless. That's not really a great reason to permanently ban me from providing information to a website

Decline reason:

No, a great reason to permanently ban you from the website is this. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:15, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shoka1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So there's nothing I can do to be allowed back on the site ever?

Decline reason:

Maybe come back in six months; I can't imagine that anyone is going to unblock with the history of hostility here. Kuru (talk) 02:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shoka1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi admins, I've been doing what I can to only put in officially sourced edits the past month and just want to be able to contribute properly. I'm aware that I broke rules on the site but rest assured it's certainly not going to happen again and if (hypothetically) it does then I will permanently refrain from requesting in the future.

Decline reason:

User:Kuru suggested six months above - not three weeks. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.