User talk:Shkrishk

December 2016

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as MS 1722:2011. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Blocked account issue

Hello,

To all whose concern (User:Bbb23, User:GAB, User:SlimVirgin).

Recently my account User:shkrishk has been blocked together with the deletion of my article which is MS 1722:2011 as being claimed by Wikipedia as sockpuppetting. This really turned me down as I put my great efforts in building the article to benefit others.

So here I am to provide explainations on what happened. There is no abusive usage of multiple accounts as claimed by Wikipedia because all those account mentioned by Wikipedia (OSHMS, Oshmsgempak, Oshmsbest, GPsatu2016, Shkrishk, Zanvanila, Joko ranger) were actually owned by the individual itself.

It is just that some of the user mentioned before were sharing the same laptops and wifi connections so thats why the ip address are relating to each of the user account that have been blocked as mentioned above.

If my account been deleted because you're suspecting me in helping the creation of the articles made by the users mentioned above ((OSHMS, Oshmsgempak, Oshmsbest, GPsatu2016, Zanvanila, Joko ranger) which were deleted over time, I hereby would like all of you to know that I never involve or abetting in creating additional articles that don't comply with Wikipedia rules.

I really wish that Wikipedia can reconsider the deletion of my article (MS 1722:2011) and also the blockage of my account. I have no intentions in violating the rules that have been stated by wikipedia especially sockpuppeting because me myself aware that it is an unmoral value and should be avoided.

Thank you. Shkrishk (talk) 2054:48, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Need explaination

Hello,

To all whose concern (User:Bbb23, User:GAB, User:SlimVirgin).

Recently my account User:shkrishk has been blocked together with the deletion of my article which is MS 1722:2011 as being claimed by Wikipedia as sockpuppetting. This really turned me down as I put my great efforts in building the article to benefit others.

So here I am to provide explainations on what happened. There is no abusive usage of multiple accounts as claimed by Wikipedia because all those account mentioned by Wikipedia (OSHMS, Oshmsgempak, Oshmsbest, GPsatu2016, Shkrishk, Zanvanila, Joko ranger) were actually owned by the individual itself.

It is just that some of the user mentioned before were sharing the same laptops and wifi connections so thats why the ip address are relating to each of the user account that have been blocked as mentioned above.

If my account been deleted because you're suspecting me in helping the creation of the articles made by the users mentioned above ((OSHMS, Oshmsgempak, Oshmsbest, GPsatu2016, Zanvanila, Joko ranger) which were deleted over time, I hereby would like all of you to know that I never involve or abetting in creating additional articles that don't comply with Wikipedia rules.

I really wish that Wikipedia can reconsider the deletion of my article (MS 1722:2011) and also the blockage of my account. I have no intentions in violating the rules that have been stated by wikipedia especially sockpuppeting because me myself aware that it is an unmoral value and should be avoided.

Thank you.

Waiting for reply

I'm still waiting for your reply towards the concern issue above (User:Bbb23, User:GAB, User:SlimVirgin)

Please, next time don't just come into conclusion and accusing people for sock puppetting without hearing explainations from the users themself. As an admin for Wikipedia, you guys should be more carefull and don't just easily come into conclusion to delete or block peoples account.

I'm really dissapointed with what happened and I'm pretty sure I won't use Wikipedia anymore after this since this page really pissed me off. I'm here to spread knowledge to peoples in this world so don't treat me as if I'm a criminal okay. Thanks