User talk:Shivj80

Welcome

Hello, Shivj80, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Shivj80, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign and indent your posts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Please make new comments at the bottom of the page and

WP:INDENT them appropriately using appropriate number of colons :

You forgot to sign your last comment. Walrus Ji (talk) 20:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on User talk:Idell were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "Add topic" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Idell (talk) 07:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. I am letting you know since the thread started only notified the IP you once used and not you directly. Nil Einne (talk) 09:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for defending me, Nil Einne. Much appreciated. Shivj80 (talk) 15:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2021 Farmers' Republic Day violence, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 03:26, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In case you're not aware, Tayi Arajakate, I myself was the one who put up that maintenance template because of an edit war occurring against a user who had named the article "farmers parade" instead of "farmers violence." He clearly had a biased agenda so I placed that template up, but now the title has been changed to an accurate one, so I see no reason to keep up the template. Please kindly remove it again. Shivj80 (talk) 01:38, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't particularly matter who may or may not have placed the template. It should stay as long as there are visible issues with the article. i.e, the article is supposed to be about the Republic Day but most of the article veers into events of the proceeding days, which makes it a problematic duplicate of 2020–2021 Indian farmers' protest, there are citation issues in the very first line itself, etc. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 06:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 08:49, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me Tayi Arajakate? My last edit involved me literally putting in the exact quote from the journal article cited. That is hardly a violation of a no original research policy. I have no idea why you would revert that. Shivj80 (talk) 15:24, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Hindutva. -- DaxServer (talk) 15:06, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why I have violated NPOV -- DaxServer? All I have done is insert the exact quote from the cited article. I genuinely do not understand why or how this violates any policy. Shivj80 (talk) 15:09, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the long-standing version doesn't have the revolutionary, and I thought you were pushing a POV. If the precise text said so, could you please post the same on the talk page at Talk:Hindutva and discuss it? Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 15:12, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've added the {{Verify source}} tag for the citation. -- DaxServer (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:12, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]