User talk:Shivaniik

Shivaniik, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Shivaniik! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Please don't move articles if you don't know what you are doing

Please don't move articles if you don't know what you are doing. You moved Draft:Rrahul Sudhir to an incorrect document space. Further, the article is still pending review through the AFC process, so you need to just chill, please. When other editors determine that it is ready, it will be moved properly. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Oh, and you shouldn't be adding unsourced birthdates and places of birth like you did here, as this could potentially violate the subject's privacy. See WP:BLPPRIVACY. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:54, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

• Last warning: If you move Draft:Rrahul Sudhir again without knowing what you're doing, your editing privileges will be revoked. I don't care if you then move it back, your edits are disruptive. Let the AFC process run. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Draft:Rrahul Sudhir, you may be blocked from editing. Diffs: [1] Since you've attempted to move this poorly-sourced content into live space, you are again being warned not to submit unsourced content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Hitesh Bhardwaj moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hitesh Bhardwaj, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 07:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajat Verma (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajat Verma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rajat Verma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:35, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajat Verma (August 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Shivaniik, how is it possible that you know this amount of information about the subject's early life and education, yet you can't include a reference? See Referencing for Beginners. And just in case, you should probably also see WP:ICTFSOURCES, so that you don't waste your time using blogs and other faceless websites as references, as those will all be disregarded and deleted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:26, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Re: these changes, references belong directly after the content being sourced, not pasted in a heap at the bottom of the page. You really should see WP:REFB, which I linked above. There's even a video that explains the process pretty nicely. Note also that anything from IWMBuzz is a press release, which is usually not considered "independent" of the subject, and thus, does nothing to build notability. Interviews like this are considered primary sources, also not independent of the subject, and thus, can't be used to establish notability. The remainder of the references included are passing mentions and again won't do anything to convince most community members that a subject is notable. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Stop posting blank help requests

If you don't stop posting blank help requests as you've done here and here and here and here, I'll just assume that you're mashing your keyboard instead of making calculated edits, and your editing privileges will be interrupted. This is starting to become a nuisance to the community. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:04, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, you may be blocked from editing. Submitting at least six blank requests. This is disruptive. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:52, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hitesh Bhardwaj

Hello, Shivaniik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hitesh Bhardwaj".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ƏXPLICIT 02:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)