User talk:Shiva321

Copyright problem: Uttara Ashādhā

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Uttara Ashādhā, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://vedic.indastro.com/learn-astrology/nakshatra-uttaraashadha.php http://vedic.indastro.com/learn-astrology/nakshatra-uttaraashadha01.php, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Uttara Ashādhā and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Uttara Ashādhā with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Uttara Ashādhā.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Uttara Ashādhā/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Uttara Ashādhā saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Ardra (nakshatra). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ebn Alexander

In his article you added: "In his book Eben says " "I will occasionally use Om as the pronoun for God",Om was the sound I remembered hearing associated with that omniscient,omnipotent,and unconditionally loving god".

This observation is in sync with ancient civilizations. The word or concept of Om as god emerges in the Upanishads.The Upanishads (Sanskrit: उपनिषद्, IAST: Upaniṣad, IPA: [upəniʂəd]) are a collection of philosophical texts which form the theoretical basis for the Hindu religion. These date back to around 600 BC.

Hindus believe that as creation began, the divine, all-encompassing consciousness took the form of the first and original vibration manifesting as sound "OM". Before creation began it was "Shunyākāsha", the emptiness or the void. The vibration of "OM" symbolizes the manifestation of God in form ("sāguna brahman"). "OM" is the reflection of the absolute reality, it is said to be "Adi Anadi", without beginning or the end and embracing all that exists.The mantra "OM" is the name of God, the vibration of the Supreme."

Why would we mention that sentence? Our encyclopedia is built up by using material from reliable sources (see WP:RS} that directly discuss the subject. We don't add material simply because we think it is interesting or important. (See WP:NOR.) So unless this has some substantial discussion in reliable sources, it doesn't belong anywhere on Wikipedia. You then went off on a tangent discussing Om. That's simply inappropriate for his biography. You also added something about ancient civilizations without a source.(of course again it was irrelevant to his biography.

At Om you added:

Om in Modern Literature & Scientific Evidence towards its existence

[Eben Alexander] III (born December, 1953 in Charlotte, North Carolina) is a neurosurgeon and the author of the best-selling Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon's Journey into the Afterlife, in which he shares his thoughts on his near-death experience and whether science can explain that heaven really does exist.

In his book Eben says " "I will occasionally use Om as the pronoun for God","OM" was the sound I remembered hearing associated with that omniscient,omnipotent,and unconditionally loving god".

The section heading is inappropriate as there is no scientific evidence towards its existence mentioned in the section. Ebn Alexander is inappropriate for the reason given above and because he isn't a recognised expert on 'Om'. I hope that explains why I reverted you. Dougweller (talk) 17:30, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Your recent editing history at Om shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. As you are new you probably won't know about this rule, but you must adhere to it. You need to use the article talk/discussion page to get agreement for this now. Dougweller (talk) 07:56, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Kalika Durga Parameshwari Temple-Vidyaranyapura-Bangalore-Karnataka-India

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sri Kalika Durga Parameshwari Temple-Vidyaranyapura-Bangalore-Karnataka-India, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://indiantemple.weebly.com/4/post/2010/1/sri-kalika-durga-parameswari-devastanam-vidyaranyapura-bangalore.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 05:02, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Shiva321/sandbox (September 9)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shiva321/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 18:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Shiva321, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!