User talk:Shiryu82

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 20:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In response, the best solution is to emphasize only the best major independent news and none of this can include announcements, press releases or notices as these cannot lend the significant weight. Also, Notability cannot be inherited. SwisterTwister talk 21:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, yes, the tone itself resembled a company advertisement or anywhere where specific detail is given, therefore it could not be accepted. However, you're welcome to add whatever could help in the sense of non-advertising information and then also independent sources. Also, if there's other enough, then it may not be substantial enough for an assured acceptance. We are indeed highly selective and have high standards but this is to only ensure the best materials are available or exist for a convincing article. SwisterTwister talk 22:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lizard Soft (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RileyBugz was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to use independent, in depth, reliable sources to support the claims the article makes. Also, you should not use language like "offers", which is promotional in nature.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lizard Soft and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 12:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Shiryu82, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 12:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GreenMeansGo was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Shiryu82/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GMG ^talk 12:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lizard Soft concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lizard Soft, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lizard Soft

Hello, Shiryu82. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lizard Soft".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 10:28, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]