User talk:Shirleyraghu

January 2022

Hello, I'm DoebLoggs. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Electronic data capture have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

my account blocked by making changes in the "Electronic data capture " page added the relevant commercial product which is available in the market, The edit I made is useful for the people who are looking for commercial electronic data capture software for clinical trials. I added the relevant information, please again review my account and unblock the account what changes I have made are irrelevant or spammy I will never do such edit again Shirleyraghu (talk) 11:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IDHT. Your changes were blatant spam. How many times do you need us to tell you this? --Yamla (talk) 13:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Electronic patient-reported outcome. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Clinical data management system, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:20, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Clinical data management system. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. DoebLoggs (talk) 13:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shirleyraghu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Shirleyraghu (talk) 2:52 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Wow. More spam above your unblock request. Please describe how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you'd make. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shirleyraghu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my account blocked by making changes in the "Electronic data capture " page added the relevant commercial product which is available in the market, The edit I made is useful for the people who are looking for commercial electronic data capture software for clinical trials. I added the relevant information, please again review my account and unblock the account what changes I have made are irrelevant or spammy I will never do such edit again

Decline reason:

Blatant spam. Please tell your coworkers to stop spamming, too. It's deeply unethical and we don't tolerate spammers here. Yamla (talk) 10:16, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 13:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shirleyraghu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay yamla, I will make sure that it will never happen again, and also I will tell my coworkers to stop spamming. Please unblock my account and remove our company website from the backlist

Decline reason:

There is no pathway forward here without you telling us what topics you will edit about that are unrelated to your clear conflict of interest. If you don't have any in mind right now, take all the time you need to figure it out, there is no deadline- but you won't be unblocked to make further conflict of interest related edits. 331dot (talk) 11:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

}} I'm deeply, deeply concerned you are asking to have the company website removed from the blacklist. There's no reason to do so unless you plan to continue spamming. Additionally, you'll need to address your violation of WP:SOCK and WP:COI and tell us what you plan to write about instead. Given your terrible behaviour so far, it will be very, very difficult to have your block lifted. --Yamla (talk) 10:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]