User talk:ShindlerElevator
Welcome
[edit]
|
I have removed your additions to User:DieselDucy, as that user has not been indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry, just blocked for 31 hours for disruptive editing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
August 2016
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)ShindlerElevator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Edit users ShindlerElevator (talk) 13:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Technical decline, now indef block as a sock. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are temporarily blocked for creating multiple bogus user pages labeling them as blocked socks, and you will need to offer a much better explanation than "Edit users" if you wish to be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- I have posted a welcome template, above, which contains a number of useful links - I suggest you have a read of them and then try to create a better unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)