User talk:Shikhar12

Our bold, revert, discuss system

Hi there, re: this edit at Tiger Shroff, when another editor reverts your changes, your recourse is to open a discussion (at Talk:Tiger Shroff) not to resubmit the content again and again. This is considered edit-warring, and it's not something that's tolerated by the community. We solve disputes through discussion and by establishing consensus. Per WP:BRD, we have a three-step process for making changes: You edit Boldly, and if you are Reverted, you must then Discuss. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thank you Kell kelly quiona (talk) 17:44, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tiger Shroff. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your last edit was your 8th attempt to add 'martial artist' to the occupation field against the general consensus despite being provided with a reason for the reversion of your previous edits. Norcaes (talk) 15:40, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tiger Shroff. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Seems like you have added "martial artist" many times before. It is time that you discuss this in the article talkpage on why it should be added. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]